Professional Regulation

Most professionals are required to abide by laws, regulations and rules affecting their practice.

As a professional, you rely on your reputation to sustain the career you’ve built. Administrative law issues such as certification problems, complaints or investigations can put that reputation in peril, impeding work and affecting your livelihood.

Professionals often grapple with serious ethical issues – issues that can become problems that threaten their reputations, security and practices. We have helped clients with almost every type of regulatory issue.

We defend individuals and work with liability insurers, professional associations and organizations to determine the best options.

Did you know that Harper Grey publishes the Canadian Administrative Law Blog?  Stay current with new case law and emerging issues – read more here.

Learn More

Professional Regulation Services

  • Providing advice regarding investigations and inquiries by administrative authorities.
  • Advocating for clients before administrative tribunals such as the Health Professions Review Board.
  • Representing clients in Judicial Review matters.
  • Appealing the decisions of administrative bodies.
  • Advising professional organizations regarding liability insurance programs, communication to members and responses to new rules and regulations.
  • Constitutional and Charter challenges.
  • Defamation, libel, slander and breach of trust matters.

  • Advising clients regarding billing audits by the Medical Services Commission, insurance companies and other organizations.
  • Human rights complaints and representation before the Human Rights Tribunal.
  • Privacy and matters relating to the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act.
  • Helping clients with issues relating to government and public bodies.
  • Professional errors and omissions insurance claims.
  • Workers Compensation Board issues.
  • Reinstatement of professional practice applications.

Featured Partners

William S. Clark* Partner
Mandeep K. Gill* Partner
Michael Hewitt* Partner
Kimberly J. Jakeman, KC* Partner
Scott J. Marcinkow* Partner
Jonathan D. Meadows* Partner
Joel A. Morris* Partner
Raj Samtani* Partner
W. Sean Taylor* Partner
Nigel Trevethan* Partner
Lara C. Zee Partner
All practice group members arrow icon

Scenarios

A pharmacist is under investigation after she fills a script incorrectly, causing a patient to experience heart palpitations and a visit to the emergency room.

The College of Dental Surgeons audits the billing practices of a dental clinic and finds out that the office manager has misappropriated funds.

A teacher transferring from another province is denied a Certificate of Qualification. He applies for Judicial Review of the decision.

Harper Grey recognized as "Consistently Recommended" in the area of Professional Liability by Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory®, 2024

Select Cases

Investigations and disciplinary hearings by securities regulatory authorities

Representing broker dealers, registered representatives and traders in investigations and disciplinary hearings by securities regulatory authorities including the BC Securities Commission, the Investment Dealers Association and the Mutual Fund Dealers Association.

Forest practice matters

Representing clients in disputes involving forest practice matters.

Wildlife management matters

Representing clients in wildlife management matters involving the Environmental Appeal Board.

Representing health care professionals

Representing health care professionals in disputes with the Medical Services Commission related to billing audits and the recovery of alleged over-payments to health professions.

Providing policy advice to professionals and organizations

Providing policy advice to professionals and organizations on matters including privacy legislation, the scope of and proposed amendments to the Health Professions Act, the role of mediation in professional regulation, the drafting of by-laws and ethical standards.

Appealing disciplinary decisions

Appealing disciplinary decisions including matters considered by the Supreme Court of Canada, such as Dr. Q. v. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia.

Scope of judicial review

Acting as counsel in many court decisions related to the scope of judicial review and appeals from administrative tribunals such as the Health Professions Review Board.

Representing professionals before their governing body in disciplinary matters

Including allegations of negligence, sexual misconduct, improper prescribing of medication, breach of confidentiality and incompetence.

arrow icon
Need a Lawyer?
Get in touch with our professional regulation team.

The Latest

Ontario Superior Court confirms limited rights of complainants to investigation records in police conduct investigation
Ontario Superior Court confirms limited rights of complainants to investigation records in police conduct investigation Ontario Superior Court confirms limited rights of complainants to investigation records in police conduct investigation
Complaint screening decisions for complaints made to the Canadian Judicial Council are subject to a reasonableness standard of review, for all issues other than procedural fairness.
Complaint screening decisions for complaints made to the Canadian Judicial Council are subject to a reasonableness standard of review, for all issues other than procedural fairness. Complaint screening decisions for complaints made to the Canadian Judicial Council are subject to a reasonableness standard of review, for all issues other than procedural fairness.
Court Agrees with Residential Tenancy Branch’s Order for Repossession and Monetary Award for Unpaid Rent
Court Agrees with Residential Tenancy Branch’s Order for Repossession and Monetary Award for Unpaid Rent Court Agrees with Residential Tenancy Branch’s Order for Repossession and Monetary Award for Unpaid Rent
Court Condemns Tribunal for Holding a Disguised Merits Review in its Jurisdictional Analysis
Court Condemns Tribunal for Holding a Disguised Merits Review in its Jurisdictional Analysis Court Condemns Tribunal for Holding a Disguised Merits Review in its Jurisdictional Analysis
Disagreement with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s Decision Insufficient to Establish Unreasonableness
Disagreement with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s Decision Insufficient to Establish Unreasonableness Disagreement with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal’s Decision Insufficient to Establish Unreasonableness
2026 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory recognizes Harper Grey as a leading law firm in 6 practice areas in Vancouver
2026 Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory recognizes Harper Grey as a leading law firm in 6 practice areas in Vancouver
No Causal Link: Alberta Court Upholds Dismissal After Workplace Harassment Complaint
No Causal Link: Alberta Court Upholds Dismissal After Workplace Harassment Complaint No Causal Link: Alberta Court Upholds Dismissal After Workplace Harassment Complaint
To Enforce or Not to Enforce: Court Upholds Conservation Authority’s Discretion
To Enforce or Not to Enforce: Court Upholds Conservation Authority’s Discretion To Enforce or Not to Enforce: Court Upholds Conservation Authority’s Discretion
Municipal decisions are not moot where ongoing adversarial context and public interest engaged
Municipal decisions are not moot where ongoing adversarial context and public interest engaged Municipal decisions are not moot where ongoing adversarial context and public interest engaged
A party’s failure to recall a witness at a Residential Tenancy Branch hearing was not a breach of procedural fairness
A party’s failure to recall a witness at a Residential Tenancy Branch hearing was not a breach of procedural fairness A party’s failure to recall a witness at a Residential Tenancy Branch hearing was not a breach of procedural fairness
No reinstatement of license for Ontario realtor
No reinstatement of license for Ontario realtor No reinstatement of license for Ontario realtor
Discrimination complaint dismissed against BC Civil Liberties Association
Discrimination complaint dismissed against BC Civil Liberties Association Discrimination complaint dismissed against BC Civil Liberties Association
BCCA Upholds Reasonableness of Review Officer’s Decision in Complex Bullying-and-Harassment Investigation Case
BCCA Upholds Reasonableness of Review Officer’s Decision in Complex Bullying-and-Harassment Investigation Case
Federal Court of Appeal Affirms Dismissal of Judicial Review Challenging a CJC Screening Decision
Federal Court of Appeal Affirms Dismissal of Judicial Review Challenging a CJC Screening Decision
Court Upholds “Aggressive Dog” Determination
Court Upholds “Aggressive Dog” Determination Court Upholds “Aggressive Dog” Determination
arrow icon