James M. Lepp, QC
Partner

DIRECT: 604 895 2825
jlepp@harpergrey.com

ASSISTANT: Jan Macleod
jmacleod@harpergrey.com

Areas of Practice

Biography

Jim Lepp chairs the health law group at Harper Grey LLP He is a senior partner with an extensive civil litigation and appellate practice. 

Jim focuses on civil matters involving allegations of medical malpractice. He has represented clients in a variety of forums, including the Labour Relations Board, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Human Rights Commission, the British Columbia Supreme Court, British Columbia Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Canada.   

Jim has litigated many cases before the British Columbia Supreme Court, has argued dozens of appeals in the British Columbia Court of Appeal, made several appearances in the Supreme Court of Canada. He is recognized by Lexpert, Law Day and Best Lawyers as a leading practitioner in the areas of health law and medical negligence.

Education

  • University of Toronto, LL.B., 1972
  • McMaster University, B.A., 1969

 Bar Admissions

  • British Columbia, 1974
  • Appointed Queen's Counsel, 2004

 Leadership

  • Chair,  Health Law Practice Group, Harper Grey LLP
  • Member, Medical Legal Society of British Columbia
  • Member, Canadian Bar Association, National Health Law Subsection

 Recognition

  • Recognized as a "Leading Practitioner" in medical negligence by Lexpert Canada
  • Recognized as one of the "Best Lawyers" in medical negligence and insurance law in Canada
  • Selected as a "Leading Lawyer" by Law Day

Client Work

Health Law

Procedural and Limitation Period Issues

  • A medical malpractice case involving an explanation of the ambit of the decision of the Court in Levitt v. Carr in circumstances where the injured Plaintiff failed to start his lawsuit while pursuing a claim for Workers’ Compensation:  Vance v. Peglar
  • A health law case involving the issue of what documents relating to a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons had to be disclosed in the context of subsequent civil proceedings:  Beale v. Nagra
  • An appeal involving the issue of what costs could be claimed by one successful Defendant against another successful Co-defendant:  Moore v. Castlegar & District Hospital
  • An appeal that decided what evidence, and professional opinions, could be obtained pursuant to Rule 28 of the Rules of Court:  Sinclair v. March (2002) 210 D.L.R. (4th) 170 (B.C.C.A.)

Commercial Litigation

Insurance Law

  • Acted for the provincial professional liability insurer of lawyers in a case determining that after securing judgment against a solicitor, the third party claimants could not seek recovery because it could not be said the claim was for injury or damage to the person or property, pursuant to the insurance legislation then in force:  Starr Schein Ent. Inc. v. Gestas Corp. Ltd. (1987), 13 B.C.L.R. (2d) 85 (C.A.)
  • Counsel for a life insurer who successfully denied coverage following a finding that the life insured had misrepresented his medical and insurance history on an application for insurance:  Armstrong v. North West Life Ins. Co. of Canada
  • Acted for an insured following injuries to the Plaintiff, incorporating issues of remoteness, foreseeability and the liability of joint and several tortfeasors:  Harrison v. Biggs

Construction Law

Articles

There is no publications for this lawyer