Health Law

Harper Grey is the leader in civil litigation defence for health practitioners in British Columbia and the Yukon. We have been counsel on the leading cases addressing the standards of medical care, consent, medical malpractice, limitation defences, and liability for medical products. We have represented our clients at every level of the judicial system, from the British Columbia Provincial Court to the Supreme Court of Canada.

In addition, we have unique experience representing clients before medical regulatory bodies in the area of administrative law.

Harper Grey's longstanding commitment to providing assistance to health care professionals includes regularly participating in medical/legal educational programs at health care institutions throughout British Columbia and the Faculty of Medicine at the University of British Columbia. Our firm was instrumental in founding the Medical/Legal Society of BC and the Health Law subsection of the BC Bar Association.

Our Areas of Focus

Claims resulting from medical treatment and care
Allegations of breach of fiduciary duty between doctor and patient
Advice regarding legislative and regulatory changes that may affect medical practice
Advice in response to threats from patients
Preparation when a physician is a defendant or witness in a criminal matter
Coroners' inquests or other types of inquiries
Proceeding before Professional Disciplinary Bodies

Representative Experience

Our significant cases include:

A seminal decision by the SCC which determined in what circumstances compliance with standard medical practice will defeat a claim in neligence.
A decision by the BCCA in an obstetrical negligence case which considered the correct test to apply in determining the liability of a defendant physician, principles related to non-pecuniary loss and the upper limits of recovery.
A decision of the SCC which held that defendants are entitled to the benefits of services provided through the social safety net with an appropriate allowance for the contingency of such programs changing or ending.
A decision of the SCC which considered the limits of doctor patient confidentiality in circumstances of danger to the public.
A decision of the BCCA which considered the standard of review applicable to professional disciplinary bodies in a case involving a physician charged with infamous conduct following a sexual relationship with a patient.
A decision of the SCC which considered the application of the modified objective test to causation in the context of informed consent claims.
A decision of the SCC in a breast implant product liability action which considered a manufacturer’s duty to warn consumers and the application of the "learned intermediary" doctrine.

For more significant cases, please read the profiles of lawyers in this group.