Health Law

Harper Grey LLP is the leader in civil litigation defence for health practitioners in British Columbia and the Yukon. We have been counsel on the leading cases addressing the standards of medical care, consent, medical malpractice, limitation defences, and liability for medical products.

Harper Grey LLP has represented our clients at every level of the judicial system, from the British Columbia Provincial Court to the Supreme Court of Canada.

In addition, we have unique experience representing clients before medical regulatory bodies such as the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia in the area of administrative law.

Harper Grey LLP's longstanding commitment to assisting health care professionals includes regularly participating in medical/legal educational programs at health care institutions throughout British Columbia and the Faculty of Medicine at the University of British Columbia. Our firm was instrumental in founding the Medical/Legal Society of BC and the Health Law subsection of the BC Bar Association.

We help health care profesisonals with legal issues such as:

  • Claims resulting from medical treatment and care
  • Allegations of breach of fiduciary duty between doctor and patient
  • Advice regarding legislative and regulatory changes that may affect medical practice
  • Advice in response to threats from patients
  • Preparation when a physician is a defendant or witness in a criminal matter
  • Coroners' Inquests or other types of inquiries
  • Proceedings before professional disciplinary bodies such as the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, the College of Dental Surgeons of British Columbia, the College of Psychologists of British Columbia and the College of Podiatrists of British Columbia

Contact person

The chair of Harper Grey LLP's health law group is James Lepp, QC. Please contact him at 604.895.2825 or via email. 

Representative Client Work

  • A seminal decision by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) which determined in what circumstances compliance with standard medical practice will defeat a claim of neligence
  • A decision by the BC Court of Appeal (BCCA) in an obstetrical negligence case which considered the correct test to apply in determining the liability of a defendant physician, principles related to non-pecuniary loss and the upper limits of recovery
  • A decision of the SCC which held that defendants are entitled to the benefits of services provided through the social safety net with an appropriate allowance for the contingency of such programs changing or ending
  • A decision of the SCC which considered the limits of doctor patient confidentiality in circumstances of danger to the public
  • A decision of the BCCA which considered the standard of review applicable to professional disciplinary bodies in a case involving a physician charged with infamous conduct following a sexual relationship with a patient
  • A decision of the SCC which considered the application of the modified objective test to causation in the context of informed consent claims
  • A decision of the SCC in a breast implant product liability action which considered a manufacturer’s duty to warn consumers and the application of the "learned intermediary" doctrine

Publications

TAGLaw Logo