Case Comment: Honing v. Phinney, 2018 BCSC 702 – Residential USTs, Misrepresentation and the Cost Recovery Provisions of the Environmental Management Act
July 17, 2018
In the case comment “Honing v. Phinney, 2018 BCSC 702 – Residential USTs, Misrepresentation and the Cost Recovery Provisions of the Environmental Management Act,” Adam Way discusses how the plaintiffs successfully recovered the remediation costs they incurred from a leaking underground storage tank. Read the complete comment here.
Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: January 16, 2024.
Related
Subscribe