Skip to the content
globe arrow
drop down arrow
EN
dollar icon
CLIENT CENTRE
Harper Grey Law Firm Logo
  • Industries & Practices
  • Team
  • Firm
  • Culture & Careers
  • Knowledge Centre
  • Contact
Search
x
Harper Grey Logo
  • Industries & Practices
  • Team
  • Firm
  • Culture & Careers
  • Knowledge Centre
  • Contact

Select Language

Disclaimer: Translations of the content on this website are provided by Google Translate. We do not guarantee the accuracy, reliability, or appropriateness of the translated text. Any discrepancies or differences created in the translation are not binding and have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement purposes. If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information contained in the translated content, please refer to the original version of the content in English.

Posts tagged Records

Visit our Knowledge Centre for more searching.

The applicant/appellant physician, Dr. Fialkov, was unsuccessful in seeking judicial review of a decision made by the Health Services Appeal and Review Board (HPARB). The HPARB dismissed Dr. Fialkov’s appeal from a decision of the Ministry of Health. The Ministry had decided that Dr. Fialkov improperly charged a patient for an insured service
The applicant/appellant physician, Dr. Fialkov, was unsuccessful in seeking judicial review of a decision made by the Health Services Appeal and Review Board (HPARB). The HPARB dismissed Dr. Fialkov’s appeal from a decision of the Ministry of Health. The Ministry had decided that Dr. Fialkov improperly charged a patient for an insured service Administrative Law Blog The applicant/appellant physician, Dr. Fialkov, was unsuccessful in seeking judicial review of a decision made by the Health Services Appeal and Review Board (HPARB). The HPARB dismissed Dr. Fialkov’s appeal from a decision of the Ministry of Health. The Ministry had decided that Dr. Fialkov improperly charged a patient for an insured service by Scott J. Marcinkow*
September 27, 2023
No harm, no foul.  Where a breach of procedural fairness has been established, the Court will not find there was a reviewable error unless the breach affected the outcome
No harm, no foul.  Where a breach of procedural fairness has been established, the Court will not find there was a reviewable error unless the breach affected the outcome Administrative Law Blog No harm, no foul. Where a breach of procedural fairness has been established, the Court will not find there was a reviewable error unless the breach affected the outcome by Mollie Clark
February 22, 2022
Harper Grey Logo

3200 - 650 West Georgia Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6B 4P7

T. 604 687 0411 F. 604 669 9385
Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
  • Industries & Practices
  • Our Team
  • Our Firm
  • Culture & Careers
  • Knowledge Centre
  • Contact Us
  • Make a Payment

How can we help you?

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Subscribe
  • Sitemap

© Harper Grey LLP 2026