Workplace Law Blog
Knowledge Centre

Updating your Progressive Discipline Policy

April 6, 2021

An annual review of your progressive discipline policy is good HR practice. Is your policy helping you to change unwanted behaviours? Are your employees aware of the policy and do they understand how it works? Is the policy helping you to communicate expected behaviour in the workplace? Is the policy being consistently and appropriately applied by your HR team?

Many employers think of progressive discipline policies only in terms of providing them with the foundation for a with cause termination if they need it. While a progressive discipline policy can do that, the more powerful tool that the policy can be is one that drives and changes behaviour in the workplace. Terminations, whether they are for cause or without cause, are costly to organizations. Terminations are time consuming, distracting and disruptive. You are always going to be further ahead if you can create longevity with your staff – and one way of doing so is through effective progressive discipline.

So, what is a progressive discipline policy? It is a comprehensive document that sets out the process that will be followed if either performance or behaviour problems arise in the workplace.  The policy is a document that your HR team can turn to any time they have a performance or behaviour problem to address. Like any other policy, your progressive discipline policy should have an introductory statement of purpose. The policy should state who it applies to and should describe the progressive discipline process that is in place in your workplace. A typical progressive discipline process will provide guidance for a number of disciplinary process levels starting with informal coaching, and ending with termination. Typically, between coaching and termination, you will have verbal warning, written warning and final written warning with possible suspension. Your policy should document investigation and documentation procedures.  The policy should be signed by each employee with an acknowledgment that they have read it and should be carefully followed in the event that performance or behaviour issues lead to the necessity to institute disciplinary proceedings. During the disciplinary process, the employee who is being disciplined should be reminded of the policy and the steps that will follow if a change in performance or behaviour is not seen.

Progressive discipline can be used to address virtually any performance or behaviour issue that arises in the workplace. Examples of the types of issues that can be addressed through progressive discipline include:

  • violations of protocols, regulations and procedures governing safety or compliance;
  • misuse of fiscal or electronic resources;
  • inappropriate or unprofessional behaviour, such as profanity, insults or solicitation; or
  • attendance and absenteeism issues.

As part of your annual HR review, take a look at your progressive discipline policy.  Does it clearly lay out the progression of discipline that will be applied? Has it been signed by all employees? Is your HR staff familiar with the progressive discipline policy and do they understand how to apply the various disciplinary steps?

A properly drafted progressive discipline policy that is communicated to the workforce and consistently and properly applied by your HR team has the potential to change behaviour.  Correction of behaviour and performance issues reduces the frequency of terminations and helps provide stability to your workplace. This in turn results in cost savings and increased productivity.

This update was authored by Rose Keith. Have questions regarding the topic discussed? Contact Rose at [email protected] or anyone else listed on the authors page.

Expertise

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: April 6, 2021.

©Harper Grey LLP 2021

 

 

Related

David Pilley recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in two areas of expertise
David Pilley recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in two areas of expertise David Pilley recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Harper Grey sponsors 2024 Allard Law Alumni Achievement Awards
Harper Grey sponsors 2024 Allard Law Alumni Achievement Awards
Abigail Turner participates as judge in external Advisory Panel for 2024 Canadian Law Awards
Abigail Turner participates as judge in external Advisory Panel for 2024 Canadian Law Awards Abigail Turner participates as judge in external Advisory Panel for 2024 Canadian Law Awards
Three Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of General Commercial Litigation
Three Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of General Commercial Litigation
Kimberly Jakeman, KC recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Kimberly Jakeman, KC recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise Kimberly Jakeman, KC recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Five Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Health Law
Five Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Health Law
Nigel Trevethan recognized as Insurance Litigator of the Year by Benchmark Litigation® Canada for third consecutive year
Nigel Trevethan recognized as Insurance Litigator of the Year by Benchmark Litigation® Canada for third consecutive year Nigel Trevethan recognized as Insurance Litigator of the Year by Benchmark Litigation® Canada for third consecutive year
Michael Hewitt recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Michael Hewitt recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise Michael Hewitt recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Environmental Law
Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Environmental Law Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Environmental Law Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Environmental Law
William Clark recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
William Clark recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise William Clark recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Construction Law
Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Construction Law Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Construction Law Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Construction Law
Proposed Changes to BC’s Land Title and Property Law Amendment Act
Proposed Changes to BC’s Land Title and Property Law Amendment Act Proposed Changes to BC’s Land Title and Property Law Amendment Act Proposed Changes to BC’s Land Title and Property Law Amendment Act
A Failed Judicial Review by Terminated Employee Who Threatened Violence
A Failed Judicial Review by Terminated Employee Who Threatened Violence A Failed Judicial Review by Terminated Employee Who Threatened Violence
Nice Try but No Dice: Academic Misconduct Hearing Proceeds Despite Delay
Nice Try but No Dice: Academic Misconduct Hearing Proceeds Despite Delay Nice Try but No Dice: Academic Misconduct Hearing Proceeds Despite Delay
Jonathan Meadows recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in three areas of expertise
Jonathan Meadows recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in three areas of expertise Jonathan Meadows recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in three areas of expertise
arrow icon

Subscribe