Posts tagged Leave to Appeal

Visit our Knowledge Centre for more searching.

Priority coverage dispute between insurance companies – someone’s got to pay!
Priority coverage dispute between insurance companies – someone’s got to pay! Priority coverage dispute between insurance companies – someone’s got to pay!
Coverage denied to driver and owner of ATV due to driver’s breach of license conditions, but granted for the owner by summary motion
Coverage denied to driver and owner of ATV due to driver’s breach of license conditions, but granted for the owner by summary motion Coverage denied to driver and owner of ATV due to driver’s breach of license conditions, but granted for the owner by summary motion
Court declines to interfere with arbitrator’s decision regarding reimbursement of accident benefits
Court declines to interfere with arbitrator’s decision regarding reimbursement of accident benefits Court declines to interfere with arbitrator’s decision regarding reimbursement of accident benefits
In Tompkins v. Meisters the appellants appealed a trial decision respecting the deductibility of certain “Part 7” benefits under s. 83 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act
In Tompkins v. Meisters the appellants appealed a trial decision respecting the deductibility of certain “Part 7” benefits under s. 83 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act In Tompkins v. Meisters the appellants appealed a trial decision respecting the deductibility of certain “Part 7” benefits under s. 83 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal finds lower court appropriately dismissed action summarily but erred in assessment of exclusion clauses
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal finds lower court appropriately dismissed action summarily but erred in assessment of exclusion clauses Saskatchewan Court of Appeal finds lower court appropriately dismissed action summarily but erred in assessment of exclusion clauses
Insureds beware: Fib not, lest you forfeit entirely your right to indemnity
Insureds beware: Fib not, lest you forfeit entirely your right to indemnity Insureds beware: Fib not, lest you forfeit entirely your right to indemnity
Ontario Court of Appeal upholds decision that insurer did not establish, on a balance of probabilities, that insured made material and fraudulent misrepresentations on application for insurance and therefore insured’s life insurance policy was valid
Ontario Court of Appeal upholds decision that insurer did not establish, on a balance of probabilities, that insured made material and fraudulent misrepresentations on application for insurance and therefore insured’s life insurance policy was valid Ontario Court of Appeal upholds decision that insurer did not establish, on a balance of probabilities, that insured made material and fraudulent misrepresentations on application for insurance and therefore insured’s life insurance policy was valid
Insurer entitled to equitable contribution from another insurer in relation to claim against pharmacist
Insurer entitled to equitable contribution from another insurer in relation to claim against pharmacist Insurer entitled to equitable contribution from another insurer in relation to claim against pharmacist
Employee not entitled to defence in claims alleging tort of intrusion upon exclusion
Employee not entitled to defence in claims alleging tort of intrusion upon exclusion Employee not entitled to defence in claims alleging tort of intrusion upon exclusion
Unclear warranty results in insurer owing a duty to defend a lawsuit for Mud Bog Event injury
Ontario Court of Appeal says that innocent persons amendment in Ontario’s Insurance Act does not have retroactive effect
The collaborative appraiser does not need to be independent
Clearing up the pollution of the duty to defend analysis
Clearing up the pollution of the duty to defend analysis Clearing up the pollution of the duty to defend analysis
Insured’s claim for uninsured motorist coverage denied on the basis of fraudulent claim for disability benefits under same policy Insured’s claim for uninsured motorist coverage denied on the basis of fraudulent claim for disability benefits under same policy
“No good deed goes uncovered”: Insurer ordered to indemnify floor damage caused by application of de-icer to prevent risk of slipping in freezing temperatures
Tort settlement does not change entitlement to Part 7 disability benefits Tort settlement does not change entitlement to Part 7 disability benefits
Not all bad faith results in punitive damages Not all bad faith results in punitive damages
Insurer who received notice of default judgment against insured nine years after action commenced not required to pay judgment