Posts categorized Insurance Law Blog

Visit our Knowledge Centre for more searching.

Clear Question, Wrong Answer: Life Policy Voided over Misrepresentation
Clear Question, Wrong Answer: Life Policy Voided over Misrepresentation Clear Question, Wrong Answer: Life Policy Voided over Misrepresentation Clear Question, Wrong Answer: Life Policy Voided over Misrepresentation
Full indemnity costs not payable to a plaintiff who succeeds with third party action against insurer
Full indemnity costs not payable to a plaintiff who succeeds with third party action against insurer Full indemnity costs not payable to a plaintiff who succeeds with third party action against insurer Full indemnity costs not payable to a plaintiff who succeeds with third party action against insurer
The SCC confirmed that clear exclusion clauses limit even “Guaranteed” coverage endorsements
The SCC confirmed that clear exclusion clauses limit even “Guaranteed” coverage endorsements The SCC confirmed that clear exclusion clauses limit even “Guaranteed” coverage endorsements The SCC confirmed that clear exclusion clauses limit even “Guaranteed” coverage endorsements
Court refuses to dismiss action for coverage brought by mortgagees not named in homeowners’ policy.
Court refuses to dismiss action for coverage brought by mortgagees not named in homeowners’ policy. Court refuses to dismiss action for coverage brought by mortgagees not named in homeowners’ policy. Court refuses to dismiss action for coverage brought by mortgagees not named in homeowners’ policy.
Hold your horses! In some cases, the Court may review pleadings in order to decide whether two actions arise out of related circumstances such that they will be considered one claim under a responding policy. However, if that cannot be done, the Court may decline to decide coverage until findings of fact have been made in the underlying litigation
Hold your horses! In some cases, the Court may review pleadings in order to decide whether two actions arise out of related circumstances such that they will be considered one claim under a responding policy. However, if that cannot be done, the Court may decline to decide coverage until findings of fact have been made in the underlying litigation Hold your horses! In some cases, the Court may review pleadings in order to decide whether two actions arise out of related circumstances such that they will be considered one claim under a responding policy. However, if that cannot be done, the Court may decline to decide coverage until findings of fact have been made in the underlying litigation Hold your horses! In some cases, the Court may review pleadings in order to decide whether two actions arise out of related circumstances such that they will be considered one claim under a responding policy. However, if that cannot be done, the Court may decline to decide coverage until findings of fact have been made in the underlying litigation
Insured successfully opposes denial of coverage on the basis of estoppel
Insured successfully opposes denial of coverage on the basis of estoppel Insured successfully opposes denial of coverage on the basis of estoppel Insured successfully opposes denial of coverage on the basis of estoppel
The evidence of an underlying plaintiff on examination for discovery does not fall into an exception to the extrinsic evidence rule
The evidence of an underlying plaintiff on examination for discovery does not fall into an exception to the extrinsic evidence rule The evidence of an underlying plaintiff on examination for discovery does not fall into an exception to the extrinsic evidence rule The evidence of an underlying plaintiff on examination for discovery does not fall into an exception to the extrinsic evidence rule
Insured granted coverage from contractor’s commercial general liability policies
Insured granted coverage from contractor’s commercial general liability policies Insured granted coverage from contractor’s commercial general liability policies Insured granted coverage from contractor’s commercial general liability policies
Ontario Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of insured’s claim due to applicable exclusion in policy
Ontario Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of insured’s claim due to applicable exclusion in policy Ontario Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of insured’s claim due to applicable exclusion in policy Ontario Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of insured’s claim due to applicable exclusion in policy
Ruling against divided loyalties 
Ruling against divided loyalties  Ruling against divided loyalties  Ruling against divided loyalties 
The perils of co-ownership
The perils of co-ownership The perils of co-ownership The perils of co-ownership
The Right Policy Takes the Ride – Family Protection Coverage endorsement (OPCF 44R) clarified  
The Right Policy Takes the Ride – Family Protection Coverage endorsement (OPCF 44R) clarified   The Right Policy Takes the Ride – Family Protection Coverage endorsement (OPCF 44R) clarified   The Right Policy Takes the Ride – Family Protection Coverage endorsement (OPCF 44R) clarified  
Insured surveying firm entitled to coverage under professional liability policy.  
Insured surveying firm entitled to coverage under professional liability policy.   Insured surveying firm entitled to coverage under professional liability policy.   Insured surveying firm entitled to coverage under professional liability policy.  
Insured award significant unpaid business losses and insurer found to have breached duty of good faith in contractual performance.
Insured award significant unpaid business losses and insurer found to have breached duty of good faith in contractual performance. Insured award significant unpaid business losses and insurer found to have breached duty of good faith in contractual performance. Insured award significant unpaid business losses and insurer found to have breached duty of good faith in contractual performance.
Insurers required to defend Province of Ontario based on a time-on-risk allocation of defence costs in claims against Ontario relating to allegations of negligent design, construction and maintenance of a bridge.
Insurers required to defend Province of Ontario based on a time-on-risk allocation of defence costs in claims against Ontario relating to allegations of negligent design, construction and maintenance of a bridge. Insurers required to defend Province of Ontario based on a time-on-risk allocation of defence costs in claims against Ontario relating to allegations of negligent design, construction and maintenance of a bridge. Insurers required to defend Province of Ontario based on a time-on-risk allocation of defence costs in claims against Ontario relating to allegations of negligent design, construction and maintenance of a bridge.
What evidence is needed to prove income loss in personal injury claims?
What evidence is needed to prove income loss in personal injury claims? What evidence is needed to prove income loss in personal injury claims?
Bee-lieve It or Not: Insurance agent negligent; insured awarded only premium amount in damages
Bee-lieve It or Not: Insurance agent negligent; insured awarded only premium amount in damages Bee-lieve It or Not: Insurance agent negligent; insured awarded only premium amount in damages Bee-lieve It or Not: Insurance agent negligent; insured awarded only premium amount in damages
When seeking damages for injuries caused by a defendant’s negligence, what is required?
When seeking damages for injuries caused by a defendant’s negligence, what is required? When seeking damages for injuries caused by a defendant’s negligence, what is required?
Policy voided after marijuana grow-op discovered following a fire
Policy voided after marijuana grow-op discovered following a fire Policy voided after marijuana grow-op discovered following a fire Policy voided after marijuana grow-op discovered following a fire
Court finds insured owner and driver of motor vehicle that killed child were underinsured within the meaning of the OPCF 44R Family Protection Coverage as personal liability umbrella policy which included a standard excess policy form (SPF 7) was not a motor vehicle liability policy within the meaning of s. 1 of the Insurance Act or s. 4 of the OPCF 44R.
Court finds insured owner and driver of motor vehicle that killed child were underinsured within the meaning of the OPCF 44R Family Protection Coverage as personal liability umbrella policy which included a standard excess policy form (SPF 7) was not a motor vehicle liability policy within the meaning of s. 1 of the Insurance Act or s. 4 of the OPCF 44R. Court finds insured owner and driver of motor vehicle that killed child were underinsured within the meaning of the OPCF 44R Family Protection Coverage as personal liability umbrella policy which included a standard excess policy form (SPF 7) was not a motor vehicle liability policy within the meaning of s. 1 of the Insurance Act or s. 4 of the OPCF 44R. Court finds insured owner and driver of motor vehicle that killed child were underinsured within the meaning of the OPCF 44R Family Protection Coverage as personal liability umbrella policy which included a standard excess policy form (SPF 7) was not a motor vehicle liability policy within the meaning of s. 1 of the Insurance Act or s. 4 of the OPCF 44R.
What do you stand to lose?  Where an insured breaches a term of an insurance policy, the Court has discretion to grant relief from forfeiture where doing so will not result in prejudice to the insurer.
What do you stand to lose?  Where an insured breaches a term of an insurance policy, the Court has discretion to grant relief from forfeiture where doing so will not result in prejudice to the insurer. What do you stand to lose?  Where an insured breaches a term of an insurance policy, the Court has discretion to grant relief from forfeiture where doing so will not result in prejudice to the insurer. What do you stand to lose?  Where an insured breaches a term of an insurance policy, the Court has discretion to grant relief from forfeiture where doing so will not result in prejudice to the insurer.
Insured succeeds in declaration that lower retention applies, and for coverage for replacement items
Insured succeeds in declaration that lower retention applies, and for coverage for replacement items Insured succeeds in declaration that lower retention applies, and for coverage for replacement items Insured succeeds in declaration that lower retention applies, and for coverage for replacement items
Insurance broker met the standard of care by advising its customer on the availability, purpose, and price of excess underinsured motorist protection coverage
Insurance broker met the standard of care by advising its customer on the availability, purpose, and price of excess underinsured motorist protection coverage Insurance broker met the standard of care by advising its customer on the availability, purpose, and price of excess underinsured motorist protection coverage Insurance broker met the standard of care by advising its customer on the availability, purpose, and price of excess underinsured motorist protection coverage
Insurer was not required to defend or indemnify an insured who had been found not criminally responsible
Insurer was not required to defend or indemnify an insured who had been found not criminally responsible Insurer was not required to defend or indemnify an insured who had been found not criminally responsible Insurer was not required to defend or indemnify an insured who had been found not criminally responsible
Subrogation limits in the context of universal health care
Subrogation limits in the context of universal health care Subrogation limits in the context of universal health care Subrogation limits in the context of universal health care
Be mindful about sub-limits!
Be mindful about sub-limits! Be mindful about sub-limits! Be mindful about sub-limits!
Cleanup Denied – Court Affirms Denial of Coverage Based on Voluntary Tank Removal Exclusion
Cleanup Denied – Court Affirms Denial of Coverage Based on Voluntary Tank Removal Exclusion Cleanup Denied – Court Affirms Denial of Coverage Based on Voluntary Tank Removal Exclusion Cleanup Denied – Court Affirms Denial of Coverage Based on Voluntary Tank Removal Exclusion
Court finds insured not entitled to liability coverage under homeowner’s policy in circumstances where insured’s criminal negligence caused fire that resulted in injury to third party as policy excluded coverage for criminal acts, whether intentional or not
Court finds insured not entitled to liability coverage under homeowner’s policy in circumstances where insured’s criminal negligence caused fire that resulted in injury to third party as policy excluded coverage for criminal acts, whether intentional or not Court finds insured not entitled to liability coverage under homeowner’s policy in circumstances where insured’s criminal negligence caused fire that resulted in injury to third party as policy excluded coverage for criminal acts, whether intentional or not Court finds insured not entitled to liability coverage under homeowner’s policy in circumstances where insured’s criminal negligence caused fire that resulted in injury to third party as policy excluded coverage for criminal acts, whether intentional or not
Windstorm? Take Cover(age)!
Windstorm? Take Cover(age)! Windstorm? Take Cover(age)! Windstorm? Take Cover(age)!
I said what I meant and I meant what I said: where an insurance policy expressly outlines specific instances where there will be coverage for additional expenses beyond the limits
I said what I meant and I meant what I said: where an insurance policy expressly outlines specific instances where there will be coverage for additional expenses beyond the limits I said what I meant and I meant what I said: where an insurance policy expressly outlines specific instances where there will be coverage for additional expenses beyond the limits I said what I meant and I meant what I said: where an insurance policy expressly outlines specific instances where there will be coverage for additional expenses beyond the limits
Broker’s conduct binds insurer to defend insured in lawsuit
Broker’s conduct binds insurer to defend insured in lawsuit Broker’s conduct binds insurer to defend insured in lawsuit Broker’s conduct binds insurer to defend insured in lawsuit
Void for misrepresentation despite the insurer knowing about the misrepresentation upheld on appeal
Void for misrepresentation despite the insurer knowing about the misrepresentation upheld on appeal Void for misrepresentation despite the insurer knowing about the misrepresentation upheld on appeal Void for misrepresentation despite the insurer knowing about the misrepresentation upheld on appeal
No coverage for wrongful termination claim indirectly involving sexual misconduct
No coverage for wrongful termination claim indirectly involving sexual misconduct No coverage for wrongful termination claim indirectly involving sexual misconduct No coverage for wrongful termination claim indirectly involving sexual misconduct
Marijuana exclusion in homeowner policy of insurance ambiguous
Marijuana exclusion in homeowner policy of insurance ambiguous Marijuana exclusion in homeowner policy of insurance ambiguous Marijuana exclusion in homeowner policy of insurance ambiguous
Insurer does not owe duty of care to tenant of insured premises
Insurer does not owe duty of care to tenant of insured premises Insurer does not owe duty of care to tenant of insured premises Insurer does not owe duty of care to tenant of insured premises
Caught by the Exclusion
Caught by the Exclusion Caught by the Exclusion Caught by the Exclusion
When Zealous Claims Adjustment Becomes Bad Faith
When Zealous Claims Adjustment Becomes Bad Faith When Zealous Claims Adjustment Becomes Bad Faith When Zealous Claims Adjustment Becomes Bad Faith
Late But Legit: Insured Wins Benefits Battle
Late But Legit: Insured Wins Benefits Battle Late But Legit: Insured Wins Benefits Battle Late But Legit: Insured Wins Benefits Battle
No repairing home or insured-insurer relationship
No repairing home or insured-insurer relationship No repairing home or insured-insurer relationship
Exclusion not coming down the pipe
Exclusion not coming down the pipe Exclusion not coming down the pipe
Alleged negligence excluded from errors and omissions coverage due to retroactive date exclusion
Alleged negligence excluded from errors and omissions coverage due to retroactive date exclusion Alleged negligence excluded from errors and omissions coverage due to retroactive date exclusion Alleged negligence excluded from errors and omissions coverage due to retroactive date exclusion
Action against ICBC for damages from a hit and run accident dismissed due to lack of reasonable efforts made to identify the person(s) involved
Action against ICBC for damages from a hit and run accident dismissed due to lack of reasonable efforts made to identify the person(s) involved Action against ICBC for damages from a hit and run accident dismissed due to lack of reasonable efforts made to identify the person(s) involved Action against ICBC for damages from a hit and run accident dismissed due to lack of reasonable efforts made to identify the person(s) involved
No professional negligence coverage for a licensed paralegal under a lawyer’s policy
No professional negligence coverage for a licensed paralegal under a lawyer’s policy No professional negligence coverage for a licensed paralegal under a lawyer’s policy No professional negligence coverage for a licensed paralegal under a lawyer’s policy
Court of Appeal confirms Extended Water Damage Endorsement did not apply as groundwater was not the direct cause of the insured’s loss
Court of Appeal confirms Extended Water Damage Endorsement did not apply as groundwater was not the direct cause of the insured’s loss Court of Appeal confirms Extended Water Damage Endorsement did not apply as groundwater was not the direct cause of the insured’s loss Court of Appeal confirms Extended Water Damage Endorsement did not apply as groundwater was not the direct cause of the insured’s loss
Off-site supplier falls within definition of “insured” under wrap up liability insurance policy
Off-site supplier falls within definition of “insured” under wrap up liability insurance policy Off-site supplier falls within definition of “insured” under wrap up liability insurance policy Off-site supplier falls within definition of “insured” under wrap up liability insurance policy
Imperfect Compliance? No Problem!
Imperfect Compliance? No Problem! Imperfect Compliance? No Problem! Imperfect Compliance? No Problem!
Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage
Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage
Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property
Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property
Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA
Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA
Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies?
Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies? Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies? Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies?
What you do know can hurt you
What you do know can hurt you What you do know can hurt you What you do know can hurt you
Reporting late provides no relief
Reporting late provides no relief Reporting late provides no relief
Don’t wait to investigate, or a coverage denial may be in the pipeline
Don’t wait to investigate, or a coverage denial may be in the pipeline Don’t wait to investigate, or a coverage denial may be in the pipeline
Delay reporting at your own peril
Delay reporting at your own peril Delay reporting at your own peril Delay reporting at your own peril
The limits of title insurance
The limits of title insurance The limits of title insurance The limits of title insurance
No defence required due to a material misrepresentation by omission
No defence required due to a material misrepresentation by omission No defence required due to a material misrepresentation by omission No defence required due to a material misrepresentation by omission
Duty to defend an insured who allegedly caused a fire using booster cables to jump a forklift
Duty to defend an insured who allegedly caused a fire using booster cables to jump a forklift Duty to defend an insured who allegedly caused a fire using booster cables to jump a forklift Duty to defend an insured who allegedly caused a fire using booster cables to jump a forklift
Private lender indemnified for prepaid interest after title fraud
Private lender indemnified for prepaid interest after title fraud Private lender indemnified for prepaid interest after title fraud Private lender indemnified for prepaid interest after title fraud
Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion
Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion
Looking for Insurance payouts? Get in line!
Looking for Insurance payouts? Get in line! Looking for Insurance payouts? Get in line! Looking for Insurance payouts? Get in line!
No means no: history of refusing excess coverage informs whether insured would have purchased excess coverage
No means no: history of refusing excess coverage informs whether insured would have purchased excess coverage No means no: history of refusing excess coverage informs whether insured would have purchased excess coverage
Collapsing soil and collapsing coverage
Collapsing soil and collapsing coverage Collapsing soil and collapsing coverage
Thorough fire investigations are key to determining coverage
Thorough fire investigations are key to determining coverage Thorough fire investigations are key to determining coverage
Give an inch, but they can’t take a mile: where an insurer is bound to coverage through the implied or ostensible authority of a broker, coverage will be limited to the scope of the representation made to the insured
Give an inch, but they can’t take a mile: where an insurer is bound to coverage through the implied or ostensible authority of a broker, coverage will be limited to the scope of the representation made to the insured Give an inch, but they can’t take a mile: where an insurer is bound to coverage through the implied or ostensible authority of a broker, coverage will be limited to the scope of the representation made to the insured Give an inch, but they can’t take a mile: where an insurer is bound to coverage through the implied or ostensible authority of a broker, coverage will be limited to the scope of the representation made to the insured
Expiry of limitation period makes demand for appraisal of no force and effect
Expiry of limitation period makes demand for appraisal of no force and effect Expiry of limitation period makes demand for appraisal of no force and effect Expiry of limitation period makes demand for appraisal of no force and effect
Consecutive inconsistent determinations of an insured’s entitlement to statutory accident benefits can be made without constituting an abuse of process
Consecutive inconsistent determinations of an insured’s entitlement to statutory accident benefits can be made without constituting an abuse of process Consecutive inconsistent determinations of an insured’s entitlement to statutory accident benefits can be made without constituting an abuse of process Consecutive inconsistent determinations of an insured’s entitlement to statutory accident benefits can be made without constituting an abuse of process
The right of equitable contribution for defence costs is limited by the scope of coverage
The right of equitable contribution for defence costs is limited by the scope of coverage The right of equitable contribution for defence costs is limited by the scope of coverage The right of equitable contribution for defence costs is limited by the scope of coverage
Don’t lie to your insurer – it doesn’t pay well
Don’t lie to your insurer – it doesn’t pay well Don’t lie to your insurer – it doesn’t pay well Don’t lie to your insurer – it doesn’t pay well
Widow’s claim for constructive trust on life insurance benefits paid to deceased’s mother rejected
Widow’s claim for constructive trust on life insurance benefits paid to deceased’s mother rejected Widow’s claim for constructive trust on life insurance benefits paid to deceased’s mother rejected Widow’s claim for constructive trust on life insurance benefits paid to deceased’s mother rejected
Relief from forfeiture not available for late reporting of D&O claim
Relief from forfeiture not available for late reporting of D&O claim Relief from forfeiture not available for late reporting of D&O claim Relief from forfeiture not available for late reporting of D&O claim
Insured not entitled to business interruption coverage for losses sustained during pandemic
Insured not entitled to business interruption coverage for losses sustained during pandemic Insured not entitled to business interruption coverage for losses sustained during pandemic Insured not entitled to business interruption coverage for losses sustained during pandemic
Insurer liable to insured for damages relating to release of pollutants from a pipeline
Insurer liable to insured for damages relating to release of pollutants from a pipeline Insurer liable to insured for damages relating to release of pollutants from a pipeline Insurer liable to insured for damages relating to release of pollutants from a pipeline
No duty to defend the insured for claims arising out of prior litigation
No duty to defend the insured for claims arising out of prior litigation No duty to defend the insured for claims arising out of prior litigation
Court of Appeal upholds $1.5M punitive damages award against disability insurer for bad faith as well as trial judge’s order of full indemnity costs to insured
Court of Appeal upholds $1.5M punitive damages award against disability insurer for bad faith as well as trial judge’s order of full indemnity costs to insured Court of Appeal upholds $1.5M punitive damages award against disability insurer for bad faith as well as trial judge’s order of full indemnity costs to insured
No by-law coverage for undamaged portions of an elevator shaft
No by-law coverage for undamaged portions of an elevator shaft No by-law coverage for undamaged portions of an elevator shaft
Priority coverage dispute between insurance companies – someone’s got to pay!
Priority coverage dispute between insurance companies – someone’s got to pay! Priority coverage dispute between insurance companies – someone’s got to pay!
Airbnb renters may be insureds under strata insurance policies
Airbnb renters may be insureds under strata insurance policies
Playing with fire and subrogation waivers
Playing with fire and subrogation waivers
Compliance costs excluded under residential homeowners policy
Compliance costs excluded under residential homeowners policy Compliance costs excluded under residential homeowners policy
Insurer applies “belts, braces and beyond” approach to excluding liability
Insurer applies “belts, braces and beyond” approach to excluding liability
A battle between experts is to be fought in a trial proper: conflicts in expert evidence weigh against suitability for summary trial
A battle between experts is to be fought in a trial proper: conflicts in expert evidence weigh against suitability for summary trial A battle between experts is to be fought in a trial proper: conflicts in expert evidence weigh against suitability for summary trial
Better to ask for permission than to seek forgiveness!
Better to ask for permission than to seek forgiveness! Better to ask for permission than to seek forgiveness!
Coverage denied to driver and owner of ATV due to driver’s breach of license conditions, but granted for the owner by summary motion
Coverage denied to driver and owner of ATV due to driver’s breach of license conditions, but granted for the owner by summary motion Coverage denied to driver and owner of ATV due to driver’s breach of license conditions, but granted for the owner by summary motion
Insured releases accident benefits insurer from all claims and is precluded from seeking punitive and aggravated damages as a result
Insured releases accident benefits insurer from all claims and is precluded from seeking punitive and aggravated damages as a result Insured releases accident benefits insurer from all claims and is precluded from seeking punitive and aggravated damages as a result
Court declines to interfere with arbitrator’s decision regarding reimbursement of accident benefits
Court declines to interfere with arbitrator’s decision regarding reimbursement of accident benefits Court declines to interfere with arbitrator’s decision regarding reimbursement of accident benefits
In Tompkins v. Meisters the appellants appealed a trial decision respecting the deductibility of certain “Part 7” benefits under s. 83 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act
In Tompkins v. Meisters the appellants appealed a trial decision respecting the deductibility of certain “Part 7” benefits under s. 83 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act In Tompkins v. Meisters the appellants appealed a trial decision respecting the deductibility of certain “Part 7” benefits under s. 83 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act
Human rights allegation allowed in civil action for breach of contract
Human rights allegation allowed in civil action for breach of contract Human rights allegation allowed in civil action for breach of contract
BC Court has jurisdiction for coverage dispute between American company and American insurer
BC Court has jurisdiction for coverage dispute between American company and American insurer BC Court has jurisdiction for coverage dispute between American company and American insurer
Court paves path for pro rata distribution in insurance dispute with several claimants
Court paves path for pro rata distribution in insurance dispute with several claimants Court paves path for pro rata distribution in insurance dispute with several claimants
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal finds lower court appropriately dismissed action summarily but erred in assessment of exclusion clauses
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal finds lower court appropriately dismissed action summarily but erred in assessment of exclusion clauses Saskatchewan Court of Appeal finds lower court appropriately dismissed action summarily but erred in assessment of exclusion clauses
Insureds should get their own property valuations
Insureds should get their own property valuations
Do not confuse an MGA with an insurer
Do not confuse an MGA with an insurer
The Duty to Defend: A Clarion Call
The Duty to Defend: A Clarion Call
The Court will not interpret coverage under an insurance policy so generously so as to amount to ignoring the terms and wording of a policy
The Court will not interpret coverage under an insurance policy so generously so as to amount to ignoring the terms and wording of a policy The Court will not interpret coverage under an insurance policy so generously so as to amount to ignoring the terms and wording of a policy
Don’t worry, you get more than one shot
Don’t worry, you get more than one shot Don’t worry, you get more than one shot
Proof of a material change in risk due to alleged affiliation with criminals requires evidence going beyond speculation
Proof of a material change in risk due to alleged affiliation with criminals requires evidence going beyond speculation Proof of a material change in risk due to alleged affiliation with criminals requires evidence going beyond speculation
Exclusion clause held not to cover certain claims arising out of negligence, as a consequence of the specific wording in the clause
Exclusion clause held not to cover certain claims arising out of negligence, as a consequence of the specific wording in the clause Exclusion clause held not to cover certain claims arising out of negligence, as a consequence of the specific wording in the clause
Insurer not under duty to defend Ontario in class action brought in relation to delays in operation of bail release system
Insurer not under duty to defend Ontario in class action brought in relation to delays in operation of bail release system Insurer not under duty to defend Ontario in class action brought in relation to delays in operation of bail release system
Dispute resolution process under Statutory Condition 11 as to value of insured property is mandatory and agreements reached pursuant to process not subject to review by court
Dispute resolution process under Statutory Condition 11 as to value of insured property is mandatory and agreements reached pursuant to process not subject to review by court Dispute resolution process under Statutory Condition 11 as to value of insured property is mandatory and agreements reached pursuant to process not subject to review by court
No coverage for assault with a knife during psychotic break
No coverage for assault with a knife during psychotic break No coverage for assault with a knife during psychotic break
The words “within your dwelling” in an insurance policy are not synonymous with “inside your dwelling”
The words “within your dwelling” in an insurance policy are not synonymous with “inside your dwelling” The words “within your dwelling” in an insurance policy are not synonymous with “inside your dwelling”
Windfall from wildfire reduced covered loss
Windfall from wildfire reduced covered loss
Feels like the first time: defending under an occurrence-based policy for damage that could have happened anytime
Feels like the first time: defending under an occurrence-based policy for damage that could have happened anytime
Insureds beware: Fib not, lest you forfeit entirely your right to indemnity
Insureds beware: Fib not, lest you forfeit entirely your right to indemnity
Ontario Court of Appeal upholds decision that insurer did not establish, on a balance of probabilities, that insured made material and fraudulent misrepresentations on application for insurance and therefore insured’s life insurance policy was valid
Ontario Court of Appeal upholds decision that insurer did not establish, on a balance of probabilities, that insured made material and fraudulent misrepresentations on application for insurance and therefore insured’s life insurance policy was valid Ontario Court of Appeal upholds decision that insurer did not establish, on a balance of probabilities, that insured made material and fraudulent misrepresentations on application for insurance and therefore insured’s life insurance policy was valid
What you don’t know can hurt you: an exclusion clause for failure to prevent an assault may exclude coverage for negligently failing to prevent assault without having any direct knowledge the assault was going to occur
What you don’t know can hurt you: an exclusion clause for failure to prevent an assault may exclude coverage for negligently failing to prevent assault without having any direct knowledge the assault was going to occur What you don’t know can hurt you: an exclusion clause for failure to prevent an assault may exclude coverage for negligently failing to prevent assault without having any direct knowledge the assault was going to occur
Once and for all: a definition for a term that appears in an insurance policy applies to the same term appearing in an excess endorsement unless the endorsement explicitly modifies the definition
Once and for all: a definition for a term that appears in an insurance policy applies to the same term appearing in an excess endorsement unless the endorsement explicitly modifies the definition Once and for all: a definition for a term that appears in an insurance policy applies to the same term appearing in an excess endorsement unless the endorsement explicitly modifies the definition
Dirt biker entitled to accident benefits from auto insurer where bike is not exempt from insurance requirements
Dirt biker entitled to accident benefits from auto insurer where bike is not exempt from insurance requirements Dirt biker entitled to accident benefits from auto insurer where bike is not exempt from insurance requirements
No coverage for claim that was reasonably foreseeable prior to inception of claims made policy
No coverage for claim that was reasonably foreseeable prior to inception of claims made policy No coverage for claim that was reasonably foreseeable prior to inception of claims made policy
Coverage down the toilet due to vacancy
Coverage down the toilet due to vacancy
Seven years too late for coverage
Seven years too late for coverage
Family of victim of accidental military activity recovers from insurers
Family of victim of accidental military activity recovers from insurers Family of victim of accidental military activity recovers from insurers
It’s too soon!
It’s too soon! It’s too soon!
Wrap up has duty to defend actions alleging defects in curtain-wall system
Homeowners’ policy for rebuilding costs included coverage for costs arising from compliance with regulatory policies
Insurer entitled to equitable contribution from another insurer in relation to claim against pharmacist
Insurer entitled to equitable contribution from another insurer in relation to claim against pharmacist Insurer entitled to equitable contribution from another insurer in relation to claim against pharmacist
Employee not entitled to defence in claims alleging tort of intrusion upon exclusion
Employee not entitled to defence in claims alleging tort of intrusion upon exclusion Employee not entitled to defence in claims alleging tort of intrusion upon exclusion
Defendant insurer entitled to jury trial in a claim for indemnity under marine insurance policy
Defendant insurer entitled to jury trial in a claim for indemnity under marine insurance policy Defendant insurer entitled to jury trial in a claim for indemnity under marine insurance policy
No uninsured motorist coverage for passenger in stolen vehicle
No uninsured motorist coverage for passenger in stolen vehicle No uninsured motorist coverage for passenger in stolen vehicle
O what a tangled web…
O what a tangled web…
Alberta Court of Appeal finds that the words “the Mortgagee” in standard mortgage clause in homeowner’s policy, while ambiguous, do not mean the actual mortgagee in circumstances where the insurer was misled about the actual lender and had no knowledge of same
Alberta Court of Appeal finds that the words “the Mortgagee” in standard mortgage clause in homeowner’s policy, while ambiguous, do not mean the actual mortgagee in circumstances where the insurer was misled about the actual lender and had no knowledge of same Alberta Court of Appeal finds that the words “the Mortgagee” in standard mortgage clause in homeowner’s policy, while ambiguous, do not mean the actual mortgagee in circumstances where the insurer was misled about the actual lender and had no knowledge of same
Coverage dried up for desiccant supplier
Coverage dried up for desiccant supplier
Policy exclusion for intentional or criminal act applies even when insured found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault
Policy exclusion for intentional or criminal act applies even when insured found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault Policy exclusion for intentional or criminal act applies even when insured found not criminally responsible for aggravated assault
A duty from mere possibilities
A duty from mere possibilities A duty from mere possibilities
It’s a scorcher!
It’s a scorcher! It’s a scorcher!
Unclear warranty results in insurer owing a duty to defend a lawsuit for Mud Bog Event injury
Court upholds insurer’s denial of life insurance coverage after insured’s overdose
Limit of liability for business losses applies to each business location
Limit of liability for business losses applies to each business location Limit of liability for business losses applies to each business location
Policy of credit risk insurance subject to limit of $100,000 across all buyers Policy of credit risk insurance subject to limit of $100,000 across all buyers
Title insurer has a duty to defend insured subject to claim for damages Title insurer has a duty to defend insured subject to claim for damages
Insureds not entitled to additional living expenses in excess of policy limits notwithstanding delays in effecting repairs and paying out the loss Insureds not entitled to additional living expenses in excess of policy limits notwithstanding delays in effecting repairs and paying out the loss
Punitive damages awarded against homeowner’s insurer for withholding payment of undisputed parts of a fire loss claim
Ontario Court of Appeal says that innocent persons amendment in Ontario’s Insurance Act does not have retroactive effect
Limitation period in SEF Family Protection Endorsement does not commence until final judgment or settlement of underlying claim
Limitation period in SEF Family Protection Endorsement does not commence until final judgment or settlement of underlying claim Limitation period in SEF Family Protection Endorsement does not commence until final judgment or settlement of underlying claim
Ruling on Duty to Defend vs Duty to Indemnify: Timing Matters
Ruling on Duty to Defend vs Duty to Indemnify: Timing Matters
Insured entitled to indemnification by insurer due to Court interpreting policy contra proferentem against insurer Insured entitled to indemnification by insurer due to Court interpreting policy contra proferentem against insurer
Insured not entitled to punitive damages or actual legal fees following an initial travel medical policy denial
Insured not entitled to punitive damages or actual legal fees following an initial travel medical policy denial Insured not entitled to punitive damages or actual legal fees following an initial travel medical policy denial
Insurer not out of time to third party broker following 2013 life insurance denial
Insurer not out of time to third party broker following 2013 life insurance denial Insurer not out of time to third party broker following 2013 life insurance denial
Life insurance policy declared valid and payable to plaintiff beneficiary due to no evidence of material or fraudulent misrepresentation
Life insurance policy declared valid and payable to plaintiff beneficiary due to no evidence of material or fraudulent misrepresentation Life insurance policy declared valid and payable to plaintiff beneficiary due to no evidence of material or fraudulent misrepresentation
The collaborative appraiser does not need to be independent
Clearing up the pollution of the duty to defend analysis
Clearing up the pollution of the duty to defend analysis Clearing up the pollution of the duty to defend analysis
Bullying is indefensible
Bullying is indefensible
Drilling down into policy limits: business interruption versus property damage
Drilling down into policy limits: business interruption versus property damage
Application for Property Inspection Granted to Insurer
Application for Property Inspection Granted to Insurer Application for Property Inspection Granted to Insurer
Flawed Duty to Defend Application Dismissed
Flawed Duty to Defend Application Dismissed Flawed Duty to Defend Application Dismissed
Intentional business decisions are not an accidental “occurrence”
Promisor’s knowledge of facts is critical to proving promissory estoppel
Failure to submit formal application for Long Term Disability under policy amounts to imperfect compliance rather than non-compliance and thus plaintiff’s was entitled to relief from forfeiture
Failure to submit formal application for Long Term Disability under policy amounts to imperfect compliance rather than non-compliance and thus plaintiff’s was entitled to relief from forfeiture Failure to submit formal application for Long Term Disability under policy amounts to imperfect compliance rather than non-compliance and thus plaintiff’s was entitled to relief from forfeiture
Insurer’s statutory right to an examination under oath authorizes an insurer to obtain information relevant to assessing its contractual obligations; it is not intended to permit insurers to embark on fishing expeditions or “take blind shots in the dark.”
Insurer’s statutory right to an examination under oath authorizes an insurer to obtain information relevant to assessing its contractual obligations; it is not intended to permit insurers to embark on fishing expeditions or “take blind shots in the dark.” Insurer’s statutory right to an examination under oath authorizes an insurer to obtain information relevant to assessing its contractual obligations; it is not intended to permit insurers to embark on fishing expeditions or “take blind shots in the dark.”
Limitation period clock does not restart when a plaintiff goes to law school
Foreclosure and ordered sale of a property does not extinguish insurable interest until title transfers in full
Foreclosure and ordered sale of a property does not extinguish insurable interest until title transfers in full Foreclosure and ordered sale of a property does not extinguish insurable interest until title transfers in full
Insurer entitled to partially deduct Part 7 medication expenses from cost of care award Insurer entitled to partially deduct Part 7 medication expenses from cost of care award
Insured had no expectation of privacy in relation to participation at case conference Insured had no expectation of privacy in relation to participation at case conference
Insured alleged to have shaken baby not entitled to defence Insured alleged to have shaken baby not entitled to defence
Insured has burden of proof in application to reinstate accident benefits Insured has burden of proof in application to reinstate accident benefits
Ontario Court of Appeal Decision Likely to Resonate in Covidian Business Loss Claims
Ontario Court of Appeal Decision Likely to Resonate in Covidian Business Loss Claims
Broker not allowed third party claim where coverage should be decided in separate proceeding
Broker not allowed third party claim where coverage should be decided in separate proceeding Broker not allowed third party claim where coverage should be decided in separate proceeding
Criminal activity was not material to life insurance risk
Criminal activity was not material to life insurance risk Criminal activity was not material to life insurance risk
Duty to defend for property damage claim less than deductible
Duty to defend for property damage claim less than deductible Duty to defend for property damage claim less than deductible
No material change prior to complete fire loss No material change prior to complete fire loss
The tort of intrusion upon seclusion is not accidental
Accident benefits to the detriment of the insured
Accident benefits to the detriment of the insured
Slippery slope not expected or intended
Insurer obligated to defend former directors of a credit union for a legal action commenced by the FRSA
Court of Appeal finds ordinary meaning of “sudden and accidental” in insurance policy to be something that was “abrupt, unexpected and unintentional” and not bound by temporal constraints
Court of Appeal finds ordinary meaning of “sudden and accidental” in insurance policy to be something that was “abrupt, unexpected and unintentional” and not bound by temporal constraints Court of Appeal finds ordinary meaning of “sudden and accidental” in insurance policy to be something that was “abrupt, unexpected and unintentional” and not bound by temporal constraints
Insurer found to have breached duty of utmost good faith by volunteering information from insured’s statement to the police
Car rental company’s policy applies in priority over employer’s non-owned policy in car accident injury case in BC
Car rental company’s policy applies in priority over employer’s non-owned policy in car accident injury case in BC Car rental company’s policy applies in priority over employer’s non-owned policy in car accident injury case in BC
Insured not entitled to E&O coverage for advice in relation to failed real estate venture Insured not entitled to E&O coverage for advice in relation to failed real estate venture
Insured denied defence due to failure to disclose business use of motor vehicle Insured denied defence due to failure to disclose business use of motor vehicle
Insured’s claim for uninsured motorist coverage denied on the basis of fraudulent claim for disability benefits under same policy Insured’s claim for uninsured motorist coverage denied on the basis of fraudulent claim for disability benefits under same policy
Mandatory dispute resolution process under Insurance Act is mandatory Mandatory dispute resolution process under Insurance Act is mandatory
Broker ordered to pay replacement cost where insured could not replace because of coverage denial
Broker ordered to pay replacement cost where insured could not replace because of coverage denial Broker ordered to pay replacement cost where insured could not replace because of coverage denial
Land and soil around insured home not insured based on policy language
Land and soil around insured home not insured based on policy language Land and soil around insured home not insured based on policy language
Homeowner and auto insurers have a concurrent duty to defend against injuries arising from the insured sledgehammering a piece of his vehicle in his backyard
Insurer successfully applies vacancy exclusion to deny coverage to intentionless insured
Wrapping up the duty to defend
Ambiguous exclusions are meaningless
Occasional payments from an acquaintance did not exclude coverage after the insured’s vehicle was stolen at gunpoint Occasional payments from an acquaintance did not exclude coverage after the insured’s vehicle was stolen at gunpoint
No policy limit for mitigation of loss coverage No policy limit for mitigation of loss coverage
Subcontractor owes duty to indemnify and defend despite contractor’s obligation to obtain wrap up liability insurance for subcontractors
“No good deed goes uncovered”: Insurer ordered to indemnify floor damage caused by application of de-icer to prevent risk of slipping in freezing temperatures
Punitive damages not necessary where fraudsters sufficiently punished by damages and costs awards
Punitive damages not necessary where fraudsters sufficiently punished by damages and costs awards Punitive damages not necessary where fraudsters sufficiently punished by damages and costs awards
Court refuses to enforce binding settlement because of misapprehension partially caused by pandemic changes to business practices
Court refuses to enforce binding settlement because of misapprehension partially caused by pandemic changes to business practices Court refuses to enforce binding settlement because of misapprehension partially caused by pandemic changes to business practices
Broad exclusion clause titled “Total Pollution Exclusion” deemed ambiguous
Intellectual property agreements are personal contracts
Beware of the foul ball
Beware of the foul ball Beware of the foul ball
The written word carries the day
The written word carries the day The written word carries the day
Don’t lose sight of the forest for the trees when considering a duty to defend
Don’t lose sight of the forest for the trees when considering a duty to defend Don’t lose sight of the forest for the trees when considering a duty to defend
Complementary insurance policies: Auto insurer did not have standing to bring an application against a personal insurer, with respect to a social event & motor vehicle accident claim
Innocent plaintiff denied coverage due to marijuana exclusion clause
Tort settlement does not change entitlement to Part 7 disability benefits
Not all bad faith results in punitive damages
Insurer who received notice of default judgment against insured nine years after action commenced not required to pay judgment
Death by drowning precipitated by a cardiac event was excluded from coverage under accidental death insurance policy