Family Law Blog
Knowledge Centre

How important are teenage children’s views in family law disputes?

November 19, 2025

HMH v JE, 2023 BCSC 922, a trial decision in which I was counsel for the claimant father, demonstrates the deference given by Courts to the preferences of teenagers in custody disputes. This was a family law decision in which the trial judge found that the respondent mother should no longer exercise parenting time or parenting responsibilities over the parties’ 16-year-old daughter.

The parties had a shared parenting arrangement confirmed in a consent order from December 2010. The order provided for joint custody and guardianship over the parties’ daughter pursuant to the Divorce Act, RSC 1985, c 3 (2nd Supp). The Divorce Act does not mention custody or guardianship. Instead, it contemplates the allocation of parenting time and decision-making responsibility.

The trial judge found that it was not in the daughter’s best interests for her mother to exercise parenting responsibilities. The mother had called her daughter numerous rude and hurtful names, which contributed to her daughter’s distress and poor opinion of herself. The daughter did not want contact with her mother and did not want her mother to exercise decision-making authority over her because she did not trust her mother to act in her best interests. Conversely, the father had a strong, affectionate, and respectful relationship with his daughter.

In assessing the views and preferences of the daughter, the trial judge held that particular weight should be given because the daughter was a competent and thoughtful, 16-year-old. The Court stated that the views of a child who is the subject of a parenting order carry increasing weight with age.

The case illustrates that courts will rarely attempt to override the considered views of a competent, older teenager concerning parenting time. The courts give heightened respect to more mature individuals. The courts also recognize that teenagers will make their own decisions as to where they will live, such that parenting orders must reasonably conform to these wishes to be practical.

If you have questions about custody, guardianship, or other family law matters, feel free to contact Jimmy Peterson or any member of our Family Law Group. You can also stay informed by exploring our most recent blog posts here.

Expertise

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: November 19, 2025.

Related

BC Human Rights Tribunal Changes its Process for Applications to Dismiss
BC Human Rights Tribunal Changes its Process for Applications to Dismiss BC Human Rights Tribunal Changes its Process for Applications to Dismiss
Rose Keith, KC authors Mediation Moment column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em> 
Rose Keith, KC authors Mediation Moment column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em>  Rose Keith, KC authors Mediation Moment column for Summer 2026 Issue of The Verdict 
Harper Grey included in Business in Vancouver’s “Biggest Law Firms in Metro Vancouver” List
Harper Grey included in Business in Vancouver’s “Biggest Law Firms in Metro Vancouver” List
Norm Streu co-authors article published by Construction Business Magazine
Norm Streu co-authors article published by Construction Business Magazine Norm Streu co-authors article published by Construction Business Magazine
Rebecca Dales, Joshua Hoenisch, Jasmine Kang, and Brendan Semchuk attend JFS Innovators 2026
Rebecca Dales, Joshua Hoenisch, Jasmine Kang, and Brendan Semchuk attend JFS Innovators 2026
Rose Keith, KC authors Employment Update Column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em> 
Rose Keith, KC authors Employment Update Column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em>  Rose Keith, KC authors Employment Update Column for Summer 2026 Issue of The Verdict 
Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment
Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment
Aren Altman participates in a panel at Art Vancouver Contemporary Art Fair 2026
Aren Altman participates in a panel at Art Vancouver Contemporary Art Fair 2026 Aren Altman participates in a panel at Art Vancouver Contemporary Art Fair 2026
Daniel Reid interviewed on CBC’s Hanomansing Tonight
Daniel Reid interviewed on CBC’s Hanomansing Tonight Daniel Reid interviewed on CBC’s Hanomansing Tonight
Ryan Bencic presents Legal Foundations for Founders Masterclass for Althra
Ryan Bencic presents Legal Foundations for Founders Masterclass for Althra Ryan Bencic presents Legal Foundations for Founders Masterclass for Althra
Steven Abramson quoted in <em>Insurance Business Magazine </em>
Steven Abramson quoted in <em>Insurance Business Magazine </em> Steven Abramson quoted in Insurance Business Magazine
Ryan Bencic quoted in <em>Business in Vancouver</em> 
Ryan Bencic quoted in <em>Business in Vancouver</em>  Ryan Bencic quoted in Business in Vancouver 
Harper Grey supports Althra second cohort launch event
Harper Grey supports Althra second cohort launch event
Natasha Cooke reappointed to Insurance Law Section Executive of Canadian Bar Association
Natasha Cooke reappointed to Insurance Law Section Executive of Canadian Bar Association Natasha Cooke reappointed to Insurance Law Section Executive of Canadian Bar Association
April Wilkinson elected to Elder Law section of Canadian Bar Association
April Wilkinson elected to Elder Law section of Canadian Bar Association April Wilkinson elected to Elder Law section of Canadian Bar Association
arrow icon

Subscribe