Posts tagged Commercial general liability insurance

Visit our Knowledge Centre for more searching.

Insurer applies “belts, braces and beyond” approach to excluding liability
Insurer applies “belts, braces and beyond” approach to excluding liability Insurer applies “belts, braces and beyond” approach to excluding liability
The Duty to Defend: A Clarion Call
The Duty to Defend: A Clarion Call The Duty to Defend: A Clarion Call
The Court will not interpret coverage under an insurance policy so generously so as to amount to ignoring the terms and wording of a policy
The Court will not interpret coverage under an insurance policy so generously so as to amount to ignoring the terms and wording of a policy The Court will not interpret coverage under an insurance policy so generously so as to amount to ignoring the terms and wording of a policy
Exclusion clause held not to cover certain claims arising out of negligence, as a consequence of the specific wording in the clause
Exclusion clause held not to cover certain claims arising out of negligence, as a consequence of the specific wording in the clause Exclusion clause held not to cover certain claims arising out of negligence, as a consequence of the specific wording in the clause
Insurer not under duty to defend Ontario in class action brought in relation to delays in operation of bail release system
Insurer not under duty to defend Ontario in class action brought in relation to delays in operation of bail release system Insurer not under duty to defend Ontario in class action brought in relation to delays in operation of bail release system
Windfall from wildfire reduced covered loss
Windfall from wildfire reduced covered loss Windfall from wildfire reduced covered loss
Feels like the first time: defending under an occurrence-based policy for damage that could have happened anytime
Feels like the first time: defending under an occurrence-based policy for damage that could have happened anytime Feels like the first time: defending under an occurrence-based policy for damage that could have happened anytime
Insurer entitled to equitable contribution from another insurer in relation to claim against pharmacist
Insurer entitled to equitable contribution from another insurer in relation to claim against pharmacist Insurer entitled to equitable contribution from another insurer in relation to claim against pharmacist
Employee not entitled to defence in claims alleging tort of intrusion upon exclusion
Employee not entitled to defence in claims alleging tort of intrusion upon exclusion Employee not entitled to defence in claims alleging tort of intrusion upon exclusion
O what a tangled web…
O what a tangled web… O what a tangled web…
Ruling on Duty to Defend vs Duty to Indemnify: Timing Matters
Ruling on Duty to Defend vs Duty to Indemnify: Timing Matters Ruling on Duty to Defend vs Duty to Indemnify: Timing Matters
Flawed Duty to Defend Application Dismissed
Flawed Duty to Defend Application Dismissed Flawed Duty to Defend Application Dismissed
Intentional business decisions are not an accidental “occurrence”
Insured alleged to have shaken baby not entitled to defence Insured alleged to have shaken baby not entitled to defence
Broad exclusion clause titled “Total Pollution Exclusion” deemed ambiguous