Workplace Law Blog
Knowledge Centre

Artificial Intelligence and the Resulting Evolving Landscape

November 28, 2025

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is changing not just the way we work, but our day to day lives.  From planning workouts and trips, to figuring out what to make for dinner, AI is becoming a frequent companion for ordinary individuals, not just tech wizards. It is also figuring largely in our workplaces. AI has the potential to transform workplaces with most companies embracing at least some form of AI.  With that transformation of our workplaces will come new legal questions and issues, including significant issues relating to confidential information and intellectual property.  The potential implications are playing out in the high-profile case involving Elon Musk and his litigation against OpenAI.  In one of the complaints filed against OpenAI, Musk’s lawyers described the rise of AI in the following terms:

The rise of generative AI products for public use is one of the most transformative technological shifts of the 21st century.  Generative AI refers to systems that can create new content – text, images, music, code and more – by learning patterns from massive datasets.  Unlike traditional AI, which classifies or predicts, generative AI produces original outputs.

Generative AI modes have delivered immense value to individuals and society at large.  They enhance productivity by, among other things, automating routine tasks, improving access to education through personalized tutoring, supporting healthcare professionals with diagnostic assistance, and empowering creators with tools for content generation.  Their ability to operate seamlessly across languages facilitates global communication, while their scalability allows organizations to process and generate vast amounts of content with unparalleled efficiency.  The societal benefits of generative AI are profound, and the next steps in advancing generative AI depend greatly on the protection of intellectual property and trade secrets that underpin their development.

The complaint clearly highlights both the importance of protection of the company’s confidential information and the significant and changing role that AI has in society as a whole.  Protecting a company’s confidential information can be vital to ensure its competitiveness.  Protecting confidential information requires careful identification of what information needs protecting, and implementation of steps to protect the confidentiality.  Those steps could include entering into confidentiality and intellectual property agreements with employees but should also include practical steps to ensure that the confidentiality of the information is actually being protected.

xAI has implemented a variety of practices to maintain its competitive position and protect its confidential and proprietary information.  One of the steps that it takes is to require as a condition of employment, that each employee enter into an Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement.  The Agreement defines “Confidential Information” to mean “any and all confidential knowledge, data or information” belong to xAI.  In addition to the confidentiality agreement, xAI implemented a number of other practices to protect its confidential information including regular security awareness training for all employees, conducting background checks on employees who may access xAI data, conducting and employing a team dedicated to information security.  A part of that teams role included audits to identify confidentiality breaches.

One of the law suits xAI is involved with concerns a former engineer that resigned and accepted employment at OpenAI. The former engineer worked with xAI’s team of approximately 20 engineers and his responsibilities included the development and training of Grok, xAI’s AI assistant.  Shortly after his resignation, xAI’s information security team discovered that the former engineer had downloaded confidential information to his personal laptop prior to his resignation.  xAI sued the engineer in part for breach of contract for breaching the provisions of the confidentiality agreement.  In the suit, xAI sought not just damages, but also an order to block the engineer from taking the role at OpenAI.  xAI was successful in obtaining a temporary court order blocking the engineer from working on or communicating about AI technologies with OpenAI, a recognition by the courts of the significant harm that can result to xAI from breach of confidentiality. This lawsuit is now just one piece of Musk’s legal battle with OpenAI in which he alleges that OpenAI is purposely hiring ex-employees of xAI to gain a competitive advantage.

Musk’s lawsuit against his former engineer demonstrates the way in which AI will influence our workplaces and the manner in which employment relationships are structured.  AI creates a whole new level of requirements for confidentiality and protection of intellectual property.  While many employment agreements have confidentiality provisions and provisions relating to ownership of intellectual property, with the development of AI those provisions will take on a new importance.  Rather than simply relying on template terms, companies will need to carefully consider crafting terms to protect their AI.  Businesses depend on maintaining the confidentiality of their proprietary information to remain competitive.  Loss of confidential and proprietary information can result in loss of market standing.  For businesses, their most valuable asset is often their confidential information. The confidentiality clause should be specific about the information that is being protected, and the organization should take purposeful steps to ensure that the confidentiality of the information is protected, including doing regular audits to identify, as in the Musk case, where employees have taken steps in breach of the confidentiality requirements of their employment.

If you have questions about this topic or any other workplace law issues, feel free to contact Rose Keith* or any member of our Workplace Law team. You can also stay informed by exploring our most recent blog posts here.

Expertise

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: November 28, 2025.

Related

BC Human Rights Tribunal Changes its Process for Applications to Dismiss
BC Human Rights Tribunal Changes its Process for Applications to Dismiss BC Human Rights Tribunal Changes its Process for Applications to Dismiss
Rose Keith, KC authors Mediation Moment column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em> 
Rose Keith, KC authors Mediation Moment column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em>  Rose Keith, KC authors Mediation Moment column for Summer 2026 Issue of The Verdict 
Harper Grey included in Business in Vancouver’s “Biggest Law Firms in Metro Vancouver” List
Harper Grey included in Business in Vancouver’s “Biggest Law Firms in Metro Vancouver” List
Norm Streu co-authors article published by Construction Business Magazine
Norm Streu co-authors article published by Construction Business Magazine Norm Streu co-authors article published by Construction Business Magazine
Rebecca Dales, Joshua Hoenisch, Jasmine Kang, and Brendan Semchuk attend JFS Innovators 2026
Rebecca Dales, Joshua Hoenisch, Jasmine Kang, and Brendan Semchuk attend JFS Innovators 2026
Rose Keith, KC authors Employment Update Column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em> 
Rose Keith, KC authors Employment Update Column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em>  Rose Keith, KC authors Employment Update Column for Summer 2026 Issue of The Verdict 
Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment
Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment
Aren Altman participates in a panel at Art Vancouver Contemporary Art Fair 2026
Aren Altman participates in a panel at Art Vancouver Contemporary Art Fair 2026 Aren Altman participates in a panel at Art Vancouver Contemporary Art Fair 2026
Daniel Reid interviewed on CBC’s Hanomansing Tonight
Daniel Reid interviewed on CBC’s Hanomansing Tonight Daniel Reid interviewed on CBC’s Hanomansing Tonight
Ryan Bencic presents Legal Foundations for Founders Masterclass for Althra
Ryan Bencic presents Legal Foundations for Founders Masterclass for Althra Ryan Bencic presents Legal Foundations for Founders Masterclass for Althra
Steven Abramson quoted in <em>Insurance Business Magazine </em>
Steven Abramson quoted in <em>Insurance Business Magazine </em> Steven Abramson quoted in Insurance Business Magazine
Ryan Bencic quoted in <em>Business in Vancouver</em> 
Ryan Bencic quoted in <em>Business in Vancouver</em>  Ryan Bencic quoted in Business in Vancouver 
Harper Grey supports Althra second cohort launch event
Harper Grey supports Althra second cohort launch event
Natasha Cooke reappointed to Insurance Law Section Executive of Canadian Bar Association
Natasha Cooke reappointed to Insurance Law Section Executive of Canadian Bar Association Natasha Cooke reappointed to Insurance Law Section Executive of Canadian Bar Association
April Wilkinson elected to Elder Law section of Canadian Bar Association
April Wilkinson elected to Elder Law section of Canadian Bar Association April Wilkinson elected to Elder Law section of Canadian Bar Association
arrow icon

Subscribe