Workplace Law Blog
Knowledge Centre

Remote Work Policy

October 4, 2021

In this world where we are continuing to fight waves of COVID, remote work remains a reality for most workplaces.  Responses range from embracing remote work as a means of retaining employees, expanding potential employment opportunities and reducing costs to reluctantly allowing remote work to continue only when absolutely necessary.  Regardless of preference it is becoming clear that remote work is here to stay in some form or another.  Leaving aside the myriad of debates around the benefits or shortfalls of remote work, one thing is clear, having a remote work policy will help you manage expectations and provide a clear basis on which to make decisions.  The question is not whether you should have a remote work policy, it is what you should include in it.

Your remote work policy should focus on what is expected of your employees and how performance will be judged.  The policy should detail circumstances where remote work will be allowed and expectations that you have for employees while working remotely.  The policy should have details relating to all aspects of remote working, including working hours, cybersecurity and confidentiality requirements.

The first step to creating your remote work policy is to decide how employees will be expected to work when they are working remotely and what communication requirements you will have during remote work.  It may be that not all roles in your organization are suited to remote work and if there are certain roles that will be excluded from the remote work policy they should be explicitly excluded.  Consider how any existing policies in your organization interact with your remote work policy.  Will all other policies apply when an employee is working remotely or are there certain policies that are only applicable in the physical workplace?

Consider the equipment needs of your employees to ensure that they are able to effectively work remotely.  Will any additional equipment be provided by the employer and will the employer fund things such as the cost of internet at the remote location?  Consider confidentiality.  Is the nature of work such that requirements should be placed on physical location of remote work to ensure that confidentiality is protected?  These should be specifically detailed in your remote workplace policy so remote workers know what is expected of them and what the employer will be doing to assist them.

Managing employees remotely present unique challenges, many of which can be addressed in the remote work place policy.  Use your policy to clearly communicate and document what is expected of employees when working remotely.  Consider whether your policy should address when employees are expected to be available online and whether you are able to provide flexibility with remote working to allow for the demands of personal lives.  If employees will be unavailable during regular working hours due to their personal lives will you have a requirement of reporting in or logging hours?  For hourly remote workers ensure that you have a clear process in place for reporting hours and clear policies to ensure that overtime is only worked with approval.  Remember that the statutory requirements imposed by legislation such as the Employment Standards Act and the Workers Compensation Act continue to apply to your employees regardless of whether they are working within your workplace or remotely.

Implementing a remote work policy is a necessary step for effective management of the modern workplace.  It not only will lessen potential liabilities but it will help manage employees and ensure that remote working is as effective as possible for your workplace.

This update was authored by Harper Grey lawyer, Rose Keith, QC. Have questions regarding the topic discussed? Contact Rose at r[email protected] or anyone else listed on the authors page.

Expertise

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: October 4, 2021.

©Harper Grey LLP 2021

 

Related

David Pilley recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in two areas of expertise
David Pilley recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in two areas of expertise David Pilley recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Harper Grey sponsors 2024 Allard Law Alumni Achievement Awards
Harper Grey sponsors 2024 Allard Law Alumni Achievement Awards
Abigail Turner participates as judge in external Advisory Panel for 2024 Canadian Law Awards
Abigail Turner participates as judge in external Advisory Panel for 2024 Canadian Law Awards Abigail Turner participates as judge in external Advisory Panel for 2024 Canadian Law Awards
Three Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of General Commercial Litigation
Three Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of General Commercial Litigation
Kimberly Jakeman, KC recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Kimberly Jakeman, KC recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise Kimberly Jakeman, KC recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Five Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Health Law
Five Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Health Law
Nigel Trevethan recognized as Insurance Litigator of the Year by Benchmark Litigation® Canada for third consecutive year
Nigel Trevethan recognized as Insurance Litigator of the Year by Benchmark Litigation® Canada for third consecutive year Nigel Trevethan recognized as Insurance Litigator of the Year by Benchmark Litigation® Canada for third consecutive year
Michael Hewitt recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Michael Hewitt recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise Michael Hewitt recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Environmental Law
Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Environmental Law Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Environmental Law Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Environmental Law
William Clark recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
William Clark recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise William Clark recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada® 2024 in two areas of expertise
Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Construction Law
Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Construction Law Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Construction Law Two Harper Grey lawyers selected by Benchmark Canada® 2024 as Litigation Stars in the area of Construction Law
Proposed Changes to BC’s Land Title and Property Law Amendment Act
Proposed Changes to BC’s Land Title and Property Law Amendment Act Proposed Changes to BC’s Land Title and Property Law Amendment Act Proposed Changes to BC’s Land Title and Property Law Amendment Act
A Failed Judicial Review by Terminated Employee Who Threatened Violence
A Failed Judicial Review by Terminated Employee Who Threatened Violence A Failed Judicial Review by Terminated Employee Who Threatened Violence
Nice Try but No Dice: Academic Misconduct Hearing Proceeds Despite Delay
Nice Try but No Dice: Academic Misconduct Hearing Proceeds Despite Delay Nice Try but No Dice: Academic Misconduct Hearing Proceeds Despite Delay
Jonathan Meadows recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in three areas of expertise
Jonathan Meadows recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in three areas of expertise Jonathan Meadows recognized as a Litigation Star by Benchmark Canada ® 2024 in three areas of expertise
arrow icon

Subscribe