Knowledge Centre

Harper Grey receives highest ranking from Benchmark Canada® 2017

May 11, 2017

For the fifth consecutive year, Harper Grey LLP has been recognized by Benchmark Canada: The Definitive Guide to Canada’s Leading Litigation Firms and Attorneys 2016 as a “Highly Recommended” local litigation firm in British Columbia. The “Highly Recommended” ranking is given to those leading law firms held as dominant in their jurisdiction. Quotes obtained through research and interviews conducted by Benchmark Canada include:

“Harper Grey is one of the best firms in Vancouver. They have excellent service, knowledge and their cost structure is excellent.”

“Every day it seems like I am dealing with someone from Harper Grey, and I always find them professional, courteous and effective.”

Benchmark Canada’s Guide includes results that are a culmination of a four-month research period that allows their researchers to conduct extensive interviews with litigators and their clients. During these interviews, they examine recent casework handled by the firms and ask sources to offer their professional opinions on litigators practicing within their province or practice area(s) across the country.

Read more about Benchmark Canada, their in-depth editorial content and methodology here.

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: January 16, 2024.

Related

Airbnb successful on appeal contesting OIPC Decision to disclose hosts personal addresses
Airbnb successful on appeal contesting OIPC Decision to disclose hosts personal addresses Airbnb successful on appeal contesting OIPC Decision to disclose hosts personal addresses
Imperfect Compliance? No Problem!
Imperfect Compliance? No Problem! Imperfect Compliance? No Problem! Imperfect Compliance? No Problem!
Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage
Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage
Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property
Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property
Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA
Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA
Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies?
Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies? Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies? Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies?
Adam Way joins Harper Grey Partnership
Adam Way joins Harper Grey Partnership Adam Way joins Harper Grey Partnership
Jennifer Woznesensky elected as newest member of Harper Grey’s Practice Management Committee
Jennifer Woznesensky elected as newest member of Harper Grey’s Practice Management Committee Jennifer Woznesensky elected as newest member of Harper Grey’s Practice Management Committee
Steven Abramson elected as Harper Grey’s Managing Partner
Steven Abramson elected as Harper Grey’s Managing Partner Steven Abramson elected as Harper Grey’s Managing Partner
What you do know can hurt you
What you do know can hurt you What you do know can hurt you What you do know can hurt you
Reporting late provides no relief
Reporting late provides no relief Reporting late provides no relief Reporting late provides no relief
Alexa Kingsmith authors article featured in BCLMA’s winter newsletter
Alexa Kingsmith authors article featured in BCLMA’s winter newsletter Alexa Kingsmith authors article featured in BCLMA’s winter newsletter
Don’t wait to investigate, or a coverage denial may be in the pipeline
Don’t wait to investigate, or a coverage denial may be in the pipeline Don’t wait to investigate, or a coverage denial may be in the pipeline Don’t wait to investigate, or a coverage denial may be in the pipeline
Lexpert republishes article authored by Song Xue and Cen Yang
Lexpert republishes article authored by Song Xue and Cen Yang Lexpert republishes article authored by Song Xue and Cen Yang Lexpert republishes article authored by Song Xue and Cen Yang
WeChat Records as Evidence: Considerations and Challenges
WeChat Records as Evidence: Considerations and Challenges WeChat Records as Evidence: Considerations and Challenges WeChat Records as Evidence: Considerations and Challenges
arrow icon

Subscribe