Knowledge Centre

An owner of property (“Gowman”) that was located within the Agricultural Land Reserve (the “ALR”) was successful in having a resolution of the Provincial Agricultural Land Commission (the “Commission”) removing 15 hectares of a neighbouring property owned by H.F. Nodes Construction Ltd. from the ALR declared a nullity on the basis that one of the commissioners involved in the decision was biased

April 28, 2009

Administrative law – Decisions of administrative tribunals – Agricultural Land Commission – Municipalities – Planning and zoning – Agricultural Land Reserve – Removal process – Notice requirements – Compliance with legislation – Judicial review – Bias

Gowman v. British Columbia (Provincial Agricultural Land Commission), [2009] B.C.J. No. 364, British Columbia Supreme Court, February 27, 2009, L.B. Gerow J.

Gowman owned property that was within the ALR. Nodes Construction was a construction company which operated out of a property in Pouce Coup. Nodes Construction owned a 111 hectare parcel of land on the outskirts of Pouce Coup and made an application to exclude from the ALR 15 hectares in the southeast portion of the larger 111 hectare parcel in order to consolidate its business into a single location.

John Kendrew was a Commissioner who was a member of the regional panel which passed the resolution excluding the Nodes Construction property from the ALR (the “Resolution”). Kendrew was a registered owner of a property located immediately to the east of and adjacent to the 15 hectares that was the subject of the exclusion application. As an adjacent landowner, Kendrew received a copy of the notice and a copy of the exclusion application. Gowman did not receive either a copy of the notice or a copy of the exclusion application prior to August 24, 2006 when the Commission passed the resolution. Gowman filed a petition seeking to have the Resolution declared a nullity due to the failure to provide him with proper notice of the application to remove the property from the ALR and on the basis that one of the Commissioners was biased.

The Court reviewed efforts made by Nodes Construction to provide notice of its application to remove the land from the ALR. Nodes Construction placed a number of newspaper advertisements as required by the legislation. As well, signage required by the Regulations was placed on the property adjacent to Highway No. 2. A copy of the notice and a copy of the exclusion application were served on six of the adjacent landowners. The Court accepted evidence that the omission to serve Gowman was inadvertent. The Court found that Nodes Construction made reasonable efforts to comply with the notice requirements.

Gowman further argued that the Resolution should be declared a nullity, or alternatively set aside, on the basis that Commissioner Kendrew was barred by the Commission’s “Interim Governance Policy” from participating in the Resolution, or alternatively, that Commissioner Kendrew’s participation gave rise to bias. The Court agreed noting that the Agricultural Land Commission Act and Regulations specifically recognized Commissioner Kendrew as an interested party by the fact that he was required to be served personally or by registered mail with notice of the exclusion application. In the Court’s view, this was a situation in which an informed person, viewing the matter reasonably and practically and having thought the matter through, would conclude that it is more likely than not that the decision-maker, whether consciously or unconsciously, would not decide fairly. Commissioner Kendrew did not merely have a community of interest with other landowners in the area; he was a landowner who was identified by the legislation as having an interest. His land was adjacent to the 15 hectare parcel for which the exclusion was sought. The Court held that Commissioner Kendrew should have declared his interest and refrained from participating in the Resolution.

In the result, the Court set aside the Resolution and the matter was remitted to the Commission.

To stay current with the new case law and emerging legal issues in this area, subscribe here.

Tags

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: January 16, 2024.

Related

BC Human Rights Tribunal Changes its Process for Applications to Dismiss
BC Human Rights Tribunal Changes its Process for Applications to Dismiss BC Human Rights Tribunal Changes its Process for Applications to Dismiss
Rose Keith, KC authors Mediation Moment column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em> 
Rose Keith, KC authors Mediation Moment column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em>  Rose Keith, KC authors Mediation Moment column for Summer 2026 Issue of The Verdict 
Harper Grey included in Business in Vancouver’s “Biggest Law Firms in Metro Vancouver” List
Harper Grey included in Business in Vancouver’s “Biggest Law Firms in Metro Vancouver” List
Norm Streu co-authors article published by Construction Business Magazine
Norm Streu co-authors article published by Construction Business Magazine Norm Streu co-authors article published by Construction Business Magazine
Rebecca Dales, Joshua Hoenisch, Jasmine Kang, and Brendan Semchuk attend JFS Innovators 2026
Rebecca Dales, Joshua Hoenisch, Jasmine Kang, and Brendan Semchuk attend JFS Innovators 2026
Rose Keith, KC authors Employment Update Column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em> 
Rose Keith, KC authors Employment Update Column for Summer 2026 Issue of <em>The Verdict</em>  Rose Keith, KC authors Employment Update Column for Summer 2026 Issue of The Verdict 
Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment
Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment Enforcement Steps After Obtaining a Monetary Judgment
Aren Altman participates in a panel at Art Vancouver Contemporary Art Fair 2026
Aren Altman participates in a panel at Art Vancouver Contemporary Art Fair 2026 Aren Altman participates in a panel at Art Vancouver Contemporary Art Fair 2026
Daniel Reid interviewed on CBC’s Hanomansing Tonight
Daniel Reid interviewed on CBC’s Hanomansing Tonight Daniel Reid interviewed on CBC’s Hanomansing Tonight
Ryan Bencic presents Legal Foundations for Founders Masterclass for Althra
Ryan Bencic presents Legal Foundations for Founders Masterclass for Althra Ryan Bencic presents Legal Foundations for Founders Masterclass for Althra
Steven Abramson quoted in <em>Insurance Business Magazine </em>
Steven Abramson quoted in <em>Insurance Business Magazine </em> Steven Abramson quoted in Insurance Business Magazine
Ryan Bencic quoted in <em>Business in Vancouver</em> 
Ryan Bencic quoted in <em>Business in Vancouver</em>  Ryan Bencic quoted in Business in Vancouver 
Harper Grey supports Althra second cohort launch event
Harper Grey supports Althra second cohort launch event
Natasha Cooke reappointed to Insurance Law Section Executive of Canadian Bar Association
Natasha Cooke reappointed to Insurance Law Section Executive of Canadian Bar Association Natasha Cooke reappointed to Insurance Law Section Executive of Canadian Bar Association
April Wilkinson elected to Elder Law section of Canadian Bar Association
April Wilkinson elected to Elder Law section of Canadian Bar Association April Wilkinson elected to Elder Law section of Canadian Bar Association
arrow icon

Subscribe