Articles & Publications
Knowledge Centre

Stay Together for The Kids: Strata Property Act Amended to Allow Residents’ Children to Reside with Them Despite Age-Restrictive Bylaws

May 2, 2023

Changes to the Strata Property Act (the “Act”) made in November 2022 prohibited strata corporations from passing bylaws which restrict ownership, tenancy and occupancy of strata units based on age; with one major exception. The November 2022 amendments to the Act continued to allow strata corporations to limit membership and residency to those aged fiftyfive and above. Following this amendment, several strata corporations in the province passed bylaws restricting residency.

Concerns that these new bylaws would frustrate the provincial government’s mission to reduce barriers to renters and those seeking to purchase so-called “middle housing” dwelling units prompted the B.C. NDP to pass an Order in Counsel on May 1st. The newest amendment continues to permit strata corporations to restrict ownership of strata units to those aged fifty-five and older, however, residency restrictions have been softened. Effective May 1, 2023, residents of strata lots whose strata corporations have passed age-restrictive bylaws and who meet those age requirements may have their spouse, adult children, and/or minor children (including future children) reside in the unit with them, regardless of that person’s age. Existing exemptions, including the caregiver exemption and the legacy exemption continue to apply.

The May 1st amendment provides flexibility by balancing the desire of many owners to live in strata complexes which focus on meeting the needs of older residents, while recognizing the housing market in the province has prompted many of these residents’ minor and adult children to reside with their parents longer than has historically been the case. It also recognizes that blanket bans on residency based on age could result in unintended consequences and conflict between residents and their strata corporations, such as a scenario in which one spouse meets the age-restriction but the other does not.

For more information, please contact Hamish Gray or any of the members of our Real Estate Practice Group.

Expertise

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: May 2, 2023. ©Harper Grey LLP 2023

Related

New benchmark for damages for injury to dignity for sexual harassment
New benchmark for damages for injury to dignity for sexual harassment New benchmark for damages for injury to dignity for sexual harassment
Damages Awarded Under Intimate Images Act
Damages Awarded Under Intimate Images Act Damages Awarded Under Intimate Images Act
Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability?
Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability? Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability? Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability?
The Dangers of Two Step Offers
The Dangers of Two Step Offers The Dangers of Two Step Offers
Court says federal political parties are subject to BC privacy legislation
Court says federal political parties are subject to BC privacy legislation Court says federal political parties are subject to BC privacy legislation
Court Grants Interim Injunction to Restrain Employees from Competing with their Former Employer
Court Grants Interim Injunction to Restrain Employees from Competing with their Former Employer Court Grants Interim Injunction to Restrain Employees from Competing with their Former Employer
Harper Grey Lawyers complete Mental Health First Aid Certification
Harper Grey Lawyers complete Mental Health First Aid Certification
Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act
Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act
Roshni Veerapen elected as Vice Chair of the Health Law Section
Roshni Veerapen elected as Vice Chair of the Health Law Section Roshni Veerapen elected as Vice Chair of the Health Law Section
Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion
Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion
National Indigenous History Month
National Indigenous History Month
Emilie LeDuc appointed to the British Columbia Law Institute Board of Directors
Emilie LeDuc appointed to the British Columbia Law Institute Board of Directors Emilie LeDuc appointed to the British Columbia Law Institute Board of Directors
William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE
William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE
A party’s deliberate decision not to attend a hearing does not render that hearing procedurally unfair
A party’s deliberate decision not to attend a hearing does not render that hearing procedurally unfair A party’s deliberate decision not to attend a hearing does not render that hearing procedurally unfair
Harper Grey’s New Website Recognized by Hermes Creative Platinum Website Award
Harper Grey’s New Website Recognized by Hermes Creative Platinum Website Award
arrow icon

Subscribe