Articles & Publications
Knowledge Centre

Money Judgment Enforcement Act reaches Royal Assent

November 15, 2023

On October 26, 2023, the Money Judgement Enforcement Act (the “Act”) received royal assent. The Act is expected to replace the Court Order Enforcement Act, RSBC 1996, c.78 (“COEA”) by 2025.

The new legislation is intended to make it easier for creditors to recover the money they are owed following judgement from the civil court or tribunal. In particular, the Act creates a universal registry for judgements, expands the scope of properties that can be seized, and simplifies the procedures for creditors to seize or garnish a debtor’s property or account.

At the same time, the Act also protects debtors from facing unreasonably harsh consequences previously imposed by the COEA. Notably, the Act removes the possibility of imprisonment for default of payment and creates new exemptions for persons earning income below minimum levels, as set by regulation. Overall, the new Act attempts to create a more equitable and efficient collections process by allowing creditors to obtain compensation in a timely manner while ensuring debtors are not deprived of reasonable rights.

Some of the key changes are as follows:

  1. UNIVERSAL REGISTRY AND CIVIL ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
    The Act will allow creditors to register their judgments into the Money Judgement Registry (the “Registry”), which will be a public and searchable database. Once the judgement is registered, that creditor will have equivalent priority as creditors that have registered their interest through the Personal Property Registry. Registration will also allow creditors to enforce the money judgement by simply instructing the civil enforcement officers to seize and sell the properties outlined in the Registry. This will eliminate the need to take the judgement to the B.C. Supreme Court and seek additional court orders for enforcement.

    Creditors will have to be mindful of the 2-year limitation period from the date of judgement to register the judgement, but in essence, these changes will offer a more straightforward, efficient and cost effective means to enforce on money judgements

  2. EXPANDED SCOPE OF ELIGIBLE PROPERTY
    Unlike the COEA, which specifies certrain interests subject to enforcement, the Act implements a presumption of “universal exigibility”, which means that every type of property that the debtor has interest in may be subject to enforcement, unless specifically exempt under the Act. This includes property or interest that is acquired after the registration of the money judgement.

    The Act also allows creditors to enforce a judgment against co-owned property. When a real property is held in joint tenancy with a nondebtor, the creditor may seize the property in its entirety, (including the interests of non-debtor coowners), or convert it into a tenancy in common and dispose of it for the purpose of satisfying the debt. This can have important consequences for the non-debtor co-owner, as the registration over the debtor’s interest continues even after the debtor dies.

  3. SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES
    Under the current regime, creditors must make a new court application for each method of collection. This means that if the creditor wishes to seize and sell property and garnish wages, they have to make separate applications for each collection effort. However, the Act will now allow creditors to enforce multiple collection methods with a single instruction to the civil enforcement officer outlining the options the creditor wants to pursue, as well as allow continual garnishment of the debtor’s account until the creditor withdraws the notice of seizure.

  4. PROTECTIONS FOR DEBTORS
    Notwithstanding the changes making collection easier for creditors, the Act also implements several provisions to ensure debtors are not unnecessarily prejudiced. First, the Act now prohibits imprisonment for default in payment of a money judgement. Second, in addition to existing exemptions in the COEA, the Act provides for new exemptions for food, money received by the debtor as compensation for loss of future income and future medical expenses from personal injury claims, pets, and burial plots. Third, exemptions for income that form the minimum amount reasonably required to support the debtor and his or her dependents, as prescribed by the regulations.

The Act marks a significant change to the collections process and is intended to make collecting on judgments an easier and more cost-effective process, however, we will have to wait until 2025 to determine if the Act plays out as intended. If you have any questions regarding obtaining or enforcing money judgments please get in touch with Karina Alibhai, Nicola Virk or any other member of our Commercial Litigation Group.

Expertise

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: November 15, 2023.

Related

Recent changes to BC’s Residential Tenancy Act
Recent changes to BC’s Residential Tenancy Act Recent changes to BC’s Residential Tenancy Act Recent changes to BC’s Residential Tenancy Act
Norm Streu co-authors article for Construction Business magazine
Norm Streu co-authors article for Construction Business magazine Norm Streu co-authors article for Construction Business magazine
New benchmark for damages for injury to dignity for sexual harassment
New benchmark for damages for injury to dignity for sexual harassment New benchmark for damages for injury to dignity for sexual harassment
Damages Awarded Under Intimate Images Act
Damages Awarded Under Intimate Images Act Damages Awarded Under Intimate Images Act
Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability?
Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability? Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability? Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability?
The Dangers of Two Step Offers
The Dangers of Two Step Offers The Dangers of Two Step Offers
Court says federal political parties are subject to BC privacy legislation
Court says federal political parties are subject to BC privacy legislation Court says federal political parties are subject to BC privacy legislation
Court Grants Interim Injunction to Restrain Employees from Competing with their Former Employer
Court Grants Interim Injunction to Restrain Employees from Competing with their Former Employer Court Grants Interim Injunction to Restrain Employees from Competing with their Former Employer
Harper Grey Lawyers complete Mental Health First Aid Certification
Harper Grey Lawyers complete Mental Health First Aid Certification
Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act
Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act
Roshni Veerapen elected as Vice Chair of the Health Law Section
Roshni Veerapen elected as Vice Chair of the Health Law Section Roshni Veerapen elected as Vice Chair of the Health Law Section
Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion
Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion
National Indigenous History Month
National Indigenous History Month
Emilie LeDuc appointed to the British Columbia Law Institute Board of Directors
Emilie LeDuc appointed to the British Columbia Law Institute Board of Directors Emilie LeDuc appointed to the British Columbia Law Institute Board of Directors
William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE
William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE
arrow icon

Subscribe