Articles & Publications
Knowledge Centre

Top 3 Considerations for Employers when faced with a Workplace Investigation

February 15, 2024

When employers are faced with a workplace investigation, it’s essential to handle the situation with sensitivity, fairness, and diligence. Here are the top three considerations they should keep in mind –

1. Fair and Impartial Investigation Process

  • One of the most crucial considerations in an investigation is that it is conducted fairly and impartiality. This begins at the outset with appointing an unbiased investigator who is trained to conduct investigations. This could be retaining an external workplace investigator/lawyer or proceeding with someone internally from HR or an internal workplace investigator to conduct the workplace investigations. It is important that if the investigation is conducted internal to an organization, that the investigator has no personal interest or involvement in the case; for example, a trained internal investigator should not perform an investigation is the allegations concern the individual that the investigator reports to.
  • The investigation process should be clear and transparent for the parties, including ensuring that all parties involved have an opportunity to present their side of the story and provide evidence. It should be confidential, to the extent possibly by law and to perform the investigation, to protect the privacy of those involved.

2. Compliance with Employment Laws and Company Policies

  • Employers must ensure that the investigation process complies with relevant employment laws and regulations. Different jurisdictions might have specific requirements regarding workplace investigations, so it is crucial to be aware of and adhere to these legal guidelines.
  • Additionally, employers should follow their own company policies and procedures when conducting investigations. Consistency in applying these policies will demonstrate a commitment to treating all employees fairly and will help build trust within the organization.

3. Prompt and Proactive Action

  • Employers should act promptly when they receive a complaint or notice of an issue that requires investigation. Timely action, amongst other things, shows that the employer takes the matter seriously and is committed to resolving the situation efficiently.
  • Being proactive means taking preventive measures to create a safe and inclusive work environment. This can involve providing training on workplace behavior, harassment prevention, and the reporting process. Proactive efforts can help mitigate the risk of potential issues arising and foster a positive workplace culture.

 

By following the steps above employers can help maintain a healthy work environment, protect the well-being of their employees and minimize potential legal liability from not conducting a proper workplace investigation to a complaint.

Expertise

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: February 12, 2024.

©Harper Grey LLP 2024

Related

Harper Grey Ranks Amongst Top Firms in Lexpert’s 2025 Bulls-Eye Chart
Harper Grey Ranks Amongst Top Firms in Lexpert’s 2025 Bulls-Eye Chart
Adam Way and Caryna Miller present at GeoEnviroPro Talk  
Adam Way and Caryna Miller present at GeoEnviroPro Talk   Adam Way and Caryna Miller present at GeoEnviroPro Talk   Adam Way and Caryna Miller present at GeoEnviroPro Talk  
Harper Grey included on Lexpert’s 2025 List of 12 Largest Firms in Vancouver
Harper Grey included on Lexpert’s 2025 List of 12 Largest Firms in Vancouver
Airbnb successful on appeal contesting OIPC Decision to disclose hosts personal addresses
Airbnb successful on appeal contesting OIPC Decision to disclose hosts personal addresses Airbnb successful on appeal contesting OIPC Decision to disclose hosts personal addresses
Imperfect Compliance? No Problem!
Imperfect Compliance? No Problem! Imperfect Compliance? No Problem! Imperfect Compliance? No Problem!
Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage
Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage
Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property
Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property
Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA
Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA
Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies?
Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies? Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies? Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies?
Adam Way joins Harper Grey Partnership
Adam Way joins Harper Grey Partnership Adam Way joins Harper Grey Partnership
Jennifer Woznesensky elected as newest member of Harper Grey’s Practice Management Committee
Jennifer Woznesensky elected as newest member of Harper Grey’s Practice Management Committee Jennifer Woznesensky elected as newest member of Harper Grey’s Practice Management Committee
Steven Abramson elected as Harper Grey’s Managing Partner
Steven Abramson elected as Harper Grey’s Managing Partner Steven Abramson elected as Harper Grey’s Managing Partner
What you do know can hurt you
What you do know can hurt you What you do know can hurt you What you do know can hurt you
Reporting late provides no relief
Reporting late provides no relief Reporting late provides no relief Reporting late provides no relief
Alexa Kingsmith authors article featured in BCLMA’s winter newsletter
Alexa Kingsmith authors article featured in BCLMA’s winter newsletter Alexa Kingsmith authors article featured in BCLMA’s winter newsletter
arrow icon

Subscribe