News
Knowledge Centre

Intimate Images Protection Act

January 30, 2024

The Intimate Images Protection Act came into force on January 29, 2024. The legislation covers intimate images, near nude images, videos, livestreams and digitally altered images or deepfakes. With the passage of the Act, anyone who has had their intimate images distributed without their consent in British Columbia, even if they have previously given consent and later revoked it, now have a new set of legal remedies. Under the New Act, the Civil Resolution Tribunal can order the removal of the images and can levy fines of as much as $500 per day for individuals and $5,000 per day for websites for not following an order to remove the image or stop sharing it. Importantly, those 14 years of age and older can apply to the Civil Resolution Tribunal for a protection order without involving a parent or adult if they choose, an important step towards providing protection for British Columbian young adults. Damages are also awardable in all levels of our Courts for the harm that results from the without consent distribution of intimate images.

The Act provides specifically that the reasonable expectation of privacy in an intimate image is not lost by the distribution of the image by the individual or by the provision of consent of the individual to the image’s distribution. The Act also specifically provides that an individual who has consented to distribution can revoke that consent at any time, triggering the responsibility on the part of the distributor to take all reasonable steps to make the intimate image unavailable to others. The protection order includes a requirement to de-index the intimate image from any search engine. The threat of distribution of an intimate image without consent triggers an entitlement to damages under the Act including compensatory, aggravated and punitive damages. The Act extends protection to deceased individuals.

In conjunction with the passage of the Act, the Province is also launching the Intimate Images Protection Services. The assistance provided includes:

  • Emotional support, information and resources;
  • Help with applying to the Civil Resolution Tribunal
  • Assistance in communication protection orders issued by the Civil Resolution Tribunal.

This important new legislation in British Columbia extends protections and remedies for those suffering the significant harm that can result from the sharing of intimate images without consent.

If you have any questions about the new legislation or any other Personal Injury matter, please get in touch with Harper Grey partner, Rose Keith, KC.

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: January 30, 2024.

Expertise

Related

Imposition of Punitive Damages Reminder to Employers of Duty of Good Faith
Imposition of Punitive Damages Reminder to Employers of Duty of Good Faith Imposition of Punitive Damages Reminder to Employers of Duty of Good Faith
Harper Grey Ranks Amongst Top Firms in Lexpert’s 2025 Bulls-Eye Chart
Harper Grey Ranks Amongst Top Firms in Lexpert’s 2025 Bulls-Eye Chart
Adam Way and Caryna Miller present at GeoEnviroPro Talk  
Adam Way and Caryna Miller present at GeoEnviroPro Talk   Adam Way and Caryna Miller present at GeoEnviroPro Talk   Adam Way and Caryna Miller present at GeoEnviroPro Talk  
Harper Grey included on Lexpert’s 2025 List of 12 Largest Firms in Vancouver
Harper Grey included on Lexpert’s 2025 List of 12 Largest Firms in Vancouver
Airbnb successful on appeal contesting OIPC Decision to disclose hosts personal addresses
Airbnb successful on appeal contesting OIPC Decision to disclose hosts personal addresses Airbnb successful on appeal contesting OIPC Decision to disclose hosts personal addresses
Imperfect Compliance? No Problem!
Imperfect Compliance? No Problem! Imperfect Compliance? No Problem! Imperfect Compliance? No Problem!
Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage
Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage Court finds that structural damage at property was caused by settlement over time, culminating in sudden event, rather than sinkhole or subsidence, such that exclusion in Policy applied to oust coverage
Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property
Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property Insured denied defence in respect to negligence claim arising out of sale of property
Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA
Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA Insurers for parties on whom minor was equally financially dependent had priority for payment of SABS to minor injured in MVA
Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies?
Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies? Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies? Security in Numbers: Who’s Liable for Coverage for One Incident with Two Policies?
Adam Way joins Harper Grey Partnership
Adam Way joins Harper Grey Partnership Adam Way joins Harper Grey Partnership
Jennifer Woznesensky elected as newest member of Harper Grey’s Practice Management Committee
Jennifer Woznesensky elected as newest member of Harper Grey’s Practice Management Committee Jennifer Woznesensky elected as newest member of Harper Grey’s Practice Management Committee
Steven Abramson elected as Harper Grey’s Managing Partner
Steven Abramson elected as Harper Grey’s Managing Partner Steven Abramson elected as Harper Grey’s Managing Partner
What you do know can hurt you
What you do know can hurt you What you do know can hurt you What you do know can hurt you
Reporting late provides no relief
Reporting late provides no relief Reporting late provides no relief Reporting late provides no relief
arrow icon

Subscribe