Knowledge Centre

Lawsuit launched against police for improperly charging drivers under BC’s new impaired driving law

May 16, 2011

STATUS UPDATE–May 16, 2011. The class action lawsuit regarding alleged improper programming of breathalyser tests administered between September 20, 2010 and November 19, 2010 is still pending certification from the Supreme Court of British Columbia. We will notify clients and others interested as soon as we receive a decision from the courts.

You are welcome to contact the lawyers handling this case with any questions. Please scroll to the bottom of this page for their information.

___________________________________________________________________

MARCH 4, 2011

Vancouver, BC A representative plaintiff has filed a class action lawsuit claiming that police were negligent in their investigations under the province’s impaired driving legislation that came into force on September 20, 2010.

The legislation states that if an approved screening device measures a blood alcohol content of .05 mg percent or higher it should display a “warn” signal. A driver who produces a “warn” is subject to an immediate driving prohibition, a significant fine and vehicle impoundment.

The lawsuit alleges that the police used improperly programmed approved screening devices (handheld breathalysers) such that drivers may have been charged under the new legislation when their blood alcohol levels were below .05 mg percent. The lawsuit does not challenge the validity of the impaired driving legislation. Rather, it is focused on the alleged deficiencies of the police in investigating and enforcing the legislation.

On November 19, 2010, the police notified the public that there was a problem with the approved screening devices such that the approved screening devices could register a “warn” when the driver’s actual blood alcohol content was lower than the .05 mg percent limit set by the new legislation. The police stopped using the approved screening devices until they could be reset to ensure, in the words of Victoria Police Department Chief Jamie Graham, that “anyone who now gets a warning signal from the device is actually in violation of the provincial law”.

If the lawsuit is certified as a class action, it will provide drivers who registered a “warn” between September 20, 2010 and November 19, 2010 with an opportunity to quash driving prohibitions improperly issued to them and to recover compensation for fines and vehicle impoundment charges that were inappropriately paid.

“The lawsuit is important, since the new driving legislation requires the public to place greater reliance on the police to properly investigate potential infractions and to stay within the bounds of the authority provided to them”, say Michael Thomas and Bernard Buettner, the lawyers representing the plaintiff. They add “In January, the municipalities responsible for policing the legislation were advised of our intention to file this action. Although the government has announced that they will consider reviewing the legislation to provide an appeal process there is no indication that people affected by the alleged negligence of the police will have their driving prohibitions quashed, fines refunded or receive compensation for towing or impounding fees.”

Harper Grey LLP is a Vancouver law firm established in 1907 that focuses on litigation and dispute resolution. The firm has represented clients in some of the highest profile and groundbreaking cases in the province.

Contacts:

Michael Thomas
Barrister & Solicitor
Harper Grey LLP
Telephone: 604 895 2873
Email: Mike Thomas

Important Notice: The information contained in this Article is intended for general information purposes only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. It is not intended as legal advice from Harper Grey LLP or the individual author(s), nor intended as a substitute for legal advice on any specific subject matter. Detailed legal counsel should be sought prior to undertaking any legal matter. The information contained in this Article is current to the last update and may change. Last Update: January 16, 2024.

Related

Recent changes to BC’s Residential Tenancy Act
Recent changes to BC’s Residential Tenancy Act Recent changes to BC’s Residential Tenancy Act Recent changes to BC’s Residential Tenancy Act
Norm Streu co-authors article for Construction Business magazine
Norm Streu co-authors article for Construction Business magazine Norm Streu co-authors article for Construction Business magazine
New benchmark for damages for injury to dignity for sexual harassment
New benchmark for damages for injury to dignity for sexual harassment New benchmark for damages for injury to dignity for sexual harassment
Damages Awarded Under Intimate Images Act
Damages Awarded Under Intimate Images Act Damages Awarded Under Intimate Images Act
Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability?
Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability? Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability? Retail Case Update: The Court’s View on Post-Accident Remedial Measures – Are They Determinative of Liability?
The Dangers of Two Step Offers
The Dangers of Two Step Offers The Dangers of Two Step Offers
Court says federal political parties are subject to BC privacy legislation
Court says federal political parties are subject to BC privacy legislation Court says federal political parties are subject to BC privacy legislation
Court Grants Interim Injunction to Restrain Employees from Competing with their Former Employer
Court Grants Interim Injunction to Restrain Employees from Competing with their Former Employer Court Grants Interim Injunction to Restrain Employees from Competing with their Former Employer
Harper Grey Lawyers complete Mental Health First Aid Certification
Harper Grey Lawyers complete Mental Health First Aid Certification
Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act
Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act Defining the Scope of the Cost Recovery Action Under BC’s Environmental Management Act
Roshni Veerapen elected as Vice Chair of the Health Law Section
Roshni Veerapen elected as Vice Chair of the Health Law Section Roshni Veerapen elected as Vice Chair of the Health Law Section
Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion
Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion Court of Appeal finds insurer has duty to defend insured in claim arising from leak of liquid chlorine from its premises despite pollution liability exclusion
National Indigenous History Month
National Indigenous History Month
Emilie LeDuc appointed to the British Columbia Law Institute Board of Directors
Emilie LeDuc appointed to the British Columbia Law Institute Board of Directors Emilie LeDuc appointed to the British Columbia Law Institute Board of Directors
William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE
William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE William Clark and Kara Hill present at the 2024 Self Governing Professions CLE
arrow icon

Subscribe